Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia 81310 UTM Skudai, Johor, Malaysia.
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):1685-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.04.005.
Previous researches on elementary grade handwriting revealed that pupils employ certain strategy when writing or drawing. The relationship between this strategy and the use of graphic rules has been documented but very little research has been devoted to the connection between the use of graphic rules and handwriting proficiency. Thus, this study was conducted to investigate the relative contribution of the use of graphic rules to the writing ability. A sample of 105 first graders who were average printers and 65 first graders who might experience handwriting difficulty, as judged by their teachers, of a normal primary school were individually tested on their use of graphic rules. It has been found that pupils who are below average printers use more non-analytic strategy than average printers to reproduce the figures. The results also reveal that below average printers do not acquire the graphic principles that foster an analytic approach to production skills. Although the findings are not sufficient to allow definitive conclusions about handwriting ability, it can be considered as one of the screening measures in identifying pupils who are at risk of handwriting difficulties.
以往对小学生书写的研究表明,学生在书写或绘画时会使用某些策略。这些策略与图形规则的使用之间的关系已经有相关记录,但很少有研究致力于探究图形规则的使用与书写熟练度之间的联系。因此,本研究旨在调查图形规则的使用对书写能力的相对贡献。我们对一所普通小学的 105 名平均书写水平的一年级学生和 65 名可能存在书写困难的一年级学生(由教师判断)进行了个体测试,以评估他们对图形规则的使用情况。研究发现,低于平均书写水平的学生比平均书写水平的学生更多地使用非分析策略来再现图形。结果还表明,低于平均书写水平的学生没有掌握图形原则,而这些原则可以促进分析性的生产技能。虽然这些发现还不足以对书写能力做出明确的结论,但可以将其视为识别有书写困难风险的学生的筛查措施之一。