Glyakina Anna V, Galzitskaya Oxana V
Institute of Mathematical Problems of Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Institutskaya str 4, Pushchino, Moscow Region 142290, Russia.
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2010 Jun;8(3):395-411. doi: 10.1142/s0219720010004707.
In this work we have studied the folding pathways for four pairs of homologous proteins from thermophilic and mesophilic organisms from two different structural classes (class a, all-alpha proteins and class d, alpha + beta proteins) using Monte Carlo simulations. We have obtained 50 trajectories for each protein and followed the free-energy profile and the order of folding of secondary structure elements between the last occurrence of the completely unfolded state and the first occurrence of the completely folded state. It turns out that the period of successful crossing of the free-energy barrier between unfolded and folded states for 40-45 trajectories (80-90%) makes 10% of the total folding time for four proteins (1tzvA, 1eyvA, 351c, and 1t4aA) and only 0.1% for two proteins (1dd3, 1ctf). This observation can be explained by a higher free-energy barrier for these proteins (1dd3, 1ctf) in comparison with other studied proteins. We have observed that folding pathways of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins may be the same, partly the same, and different. And similarity or difference between the folding pathways of thermophilic and mesophilic proteins does not depend on the structural class to which these proteins belong. Folding pathways for proteins from both classes correlate with the calculated folding nuclei for these proteins.
在这项工作中,我们使用蒙特卡罗模拟研究了来自嗜热和嗜温生物的四对同源蛋白质的折叠途径,这些蛋白质来自两种不同的结构类别(a类,全α蛋白;d类,α + β蛋白)。我们为每种蛋白质获得了50条轨迹,并跟踪了从完全未折叠状态的最后一次出现到完全折叠状态的首次出现之间的自由能分布和二级结构元件的折叠顺序。结果表明,40 - 45条轨迹(80 - 90%)在未折叠和折叠状态之间成功跨越自由能障碍的时间段占四种蛋白质(1tzvA、1eyvA、351c和1t4aA)总折叠时间的10%,而对于两种蛋白质(1dd3、1ctf)仅占0.1%。这一观察结果可以通过与其他研究的蛋白质相比,这些蛋白质(1dd3、1ctf)具有更高的自由能障碍来解释。我们观察到嗜热和嗜温蛋白质的折叠途径可能相同、部分相同或不同。并且嗜热和嗜温蛋白质折叠途径之间的相似性或差异并不取决于这些蛋白质所属的结构类别。这两类蛋白质的折叠途径都与为这些蛋白质计算出的折叠核相关。