Medical Retina Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;94(9):1205-10. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.173765. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
To report the effect of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections (IVI) on visual acuity in eyes with choroidal neovascularisation (CNVM) and co-existent vitreomacular traction (VMT) or when VMT has developed during the course of treatment.
Retrospective interventional case series of seven eyes in seven patients. VMT was monitored with serial optical coherence tomography scans.
The mean age at presentation was 74 years (range 64-95 years). All patients presented with blurring of central vision, rather than distortion. The aetiology of CNVM was wet age-related macular degeneration in five eyes (72%), angioid streaks in one eye (14%) and pathological myopia in one eye (14%). Ranibizumab was used in four eyes (57%) and bevacizumab in three (43%) for the active CNVM component. The mean follow-up was 11 months (range 2-28 months). None of the eyes in this series required surgery for the VMT component, nor were there any cases of spontaneous resolution of VMT. Visual acuity was stabilised or improved in five of the seven eyes (71%) with IVI. Visual acuity results across the whole group were gain of three or more lines of Snellen visual acuity in two eyes (28%), gain of up to three lines in three eyes (42%), no change in visual acuity in one eye (14%) and loss of up to three lines in one eye (14%). There were no eyes losing more than three lines of Snellen visual acuity. In four eyes with pre-existing VMT, visual acuity improved in three with IVI. In three eyes that developed VMT after IVI, visual acuity improved in two with IVI. Delay from diagnosis of CNVM to treatment with IVI contributed to a poor response.
Most eyes improved visual acuity with IVI for combined CNVM and VMT. Despite the often dramatic features of VMT on optical coherence tomography, treatment of co-existing CNVM should be prompt. Vitreoretinal surgery was not required in this series, but is held in reserve if there is still potential for gain in vision following CNVM resolution.
报告玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子注射(IVI)对伴有脉络膜新生血管(CNVM)和并存玻璃体黄斑牵引(VMT)或在治疗过程中发生 VMT 的 CNVM 眼视力的影响。
回顾性干预性病例系列,共纳入 7 名患者的 7 只眼。通过连续光学相干断层扫描监测 VMT。
患者平均年龄为 74 岁(64-95 岁)。所有患者均以中央视力模糊为首发症状,而非变形。5 只眼(72%)的 CNVM 病因是湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性,1 只眼(14%)为脉络膜血管瘤样条纹,1 只眼(14%)为病理性近视。4 只眼(57%)使用雷珠单抗,3 只眼(43%)使用贝伐单抗治疗活动性 CNVM 成分。平均随访时间为 11 个月(2-28 个月)。该系列中没有 1 只眼因 VMT 成分需要手术,也没有 VMT 自发缓解的病例。7 只眼中有 5 只(71%)通过 IVI 稳定或提高了视力。整个组的视力结果是:2 只眼(28%)提高了 3 行或以上的 Snellen 视力,3 只眼(42%)提高了 3 行以内,1 只眼(14%)视力无变化,1 只眼(14%)视力下降了 3 行以内。没有视力下降超过 3 行的眼。在 4 只预先存在 VMT 的眼中,3 只通过 IVI 视力提高。在 3 只接受 IVI 治疗后发生 VMT 的眼中,2 只通过 IVI 视力提高。从 CNVM 诊断到 IVI 治疗的延迟导致了较差的反应。
大多数眼通过 IVI 治疗联合 CNVM 和 VMT 后视力提高。尽管 VMT 在光学相干断层扫描上的特征往往很明显,但对并存的 CNVM 应及时进行治疗。在该系列中未进行玻璃体视网膜手术,但如果 CNVM 消退后仍有视力提高的潜力,则保留该手术。