Suppr超能文献

[Comparative efficacy of PD and VAD regimens for multiple myeloma].

作者信息

Zhao Yu, Jing Yu, Bo Jian, Wang Shu-Hong, Li Hong-Hua, Huang Wen-Rong, Zhu Hai-Yan, Han Xiao-Ping, Gao Chun-Ji, Yu Li

机构信息

Department of Hematology, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Jun;18(3):652-4.

Abstract

This study was aimed to compare the efficacy and adverse effects of PD (bortezomib + dexamethasone) and VAD (vincristine + adriamycin + dexamethasone) as regimens for treatment of multiple myeloma patients. 21 and 31 multiple myeloma patients were enrolled in the PD and VAD groups respectively which received 2 to 5 courses of treatments, and both clinical effects and adverse reactions were observed. In the all 52 patients, 48 were newly diagnosed and the other 4 patients had accepted 1 to 2 courses of M2 or MP treatment, but didn't get PR. In 52 patients, 4, 4, 8 and 5 patients accepted 2, 3, 4 and 5 courses of PD regimen respectively, while 6, 11, 12 and 2 patients accepted 2, 3, 4 and 5 courses of VAD regimen respectively. The results indicated that the rate of good efficacy (both CR and VGPR) in PD group was 57.1%, while the rate of good efficacy in VAD group was 16.1%, there was significant difference (p = 0.0052). The percentage of patients who got CR, VGPR and PR in PD and VAD groups were 95.2% and 74.2% respectively, there was no significant difference (p = 0.1108). The incidences of adverse effects in 2 groups were similar, which included hematological toxicity, liver and kidney functional lesion, peripheral neuropathy, infection, interstitial pneumonia. It is concluded that compared with conventional VAD chemotherapy, PD may improve CR and VGPR rate in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma, meanwhile it does not bring about more and worse toxicity.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验