Suppr超能文献

经皮组织扩张器置入的微创方法。

A minimally invasive approach to the placement of tissue expanders.

机构信息

University of Michigan Health System, Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic Surgery, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Semin Plast Surg. 2008 Feb;22(1):9-17. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019137.

Abstract

Plastic surgeons are frequently faced with difficult and challenging soft tissue defects in all areas of the body. To reconstruct these defects, there are many operative approaches available to the reconstructive surgeon including skin grafts, local flaps, regional flaps, and free-tissue transfer. Despite these many options, occasionally the best alternative for reconstruction of a wound is tissue expansion, where skin of similar quality, texture, and color can be used to close a soft tissue defect. Unfortunately, there are significant problems related to tissue expander reconstruction including a complication rate as high as 50%. As a result, tissue expander reconstruction has not achieved the widespread popularity commensurate with its potential clinical utility. To reduce the complication rate related to open tissue expander placement, and consequently to improve its clinical utility, we have employed endoscopic techniques for the placement of tissue expanders. Endoscopic approaches are currently being used in many areas of surgery and have resulted in substantial benefits. Endoscopic placement of tissue expanders has the benefit of reducing operative time, major complication rate, time to full expansion, and length of hospital stay. The purpose of this article is to critically examine the current open technique for tissue expander placement and to compare this technique with minimally invasive endoscopic tissue expander placement. We will discuss in detail the current problems associated with open tissue expander placement, the benefits of endoscopic tissue expansion, the technique of endoscopic tissue expander placement, and the outcomes for these techniques.

摘要

整形外科医生经常面临身体各部位的困难和具有挑战性的软组织缺损。为了重建这些缺损,重建外科医生有许多手术方法可供选择,包括皮片移植、局部皮瓣、区域性皮瓣和游离组织转移。尽管有许多选择,但对于伤口重建来说,有时最好的替代方法是组织扩张,其中可以使用质量、质地和颜色相似的皮肤来闭合软组织缺损。不幸的是,组织扩张器重建存在显著问题,包括高达 50%的并发症发生率。因此,组织扩张器重建并没有达到与其潜在临床应用相当的广泛普及。为了降低与开放式组织扩张器放置相关的并发症发生率,从而提高其临床应用效果,我们已经采用了内镜技术来放置组织扩张器。内镜技术目前正在许多外科领域中使用,并带来了显著的益处。内镜下放置组织扩张器具有缩短手术时间、降低主要并发症发生率、完全扩张时间和住院时间的优点。本文的目的是批判性地检查目前用于组织扩张器放置的开放式技术,并将其与微创内镜组织扩张器放置进行比较。我们将详细讨论开放式组织扩张器放置相关的当前问题、内镜组织扩张的益处、内镜组织扩张器放置技术以及这些技术的结果。

相似文献

1
A minimally invasive approach to the placement of tissue expanders.
Semin Plast Surg. 2008 Feb;22(1):9-17. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1019137.
2
Endoscopic versus open tissue-expander placement: is less invasive better?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):894-906. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252310.87638.ae.
4
Endoscopic-assisted neck tissue expansion in reconstruction of facial burn injuries.
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 Mar;25(2):455-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000502.
5
[Establishment and validation of a clinical prediction model for infection risk at the placement sites of skin and soft tissue expanders].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2021 Sep 20;37(9):846-852. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200619-00314.
6
Lower Extremity Pediatric Tissue Expansion: A Single Surgeon's 16-Year Experience.
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 Jan 1;92(1):41-49. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003715. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
7
Endoscopy-assisted versus open tissue expander placement in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a meta-analysis.
J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):193-201. doi: 10.1080/2000656X.2022.2032106. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
8
Endoscopic Tissue Expander Implantation in Postburn Reconstruction: A Review of the Literature.
J Burn Care Res. 2024 Sep 6;45(5):1160-1164. doi: 10.1093/jbcr/irae097.
9
Distant blunt forceps dissection in tissue expander insertion: A novel technique.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2016 Fall;24(3):174-176. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000971. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
10
Immediate and early tissue expander placement for acute closure of scalp wounds.
Ann Plast Surg. 2013 Aug;71(2):160-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182933e05.

引用本文的文献

1
'Expansion ' concept as a new technique for expanding skin and soft tissue.
Exp Ther Med. 2013 Nov;6(5):1295-1299. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.1269. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Endoscopic versus open tissue-expander placement: is less invasive better?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Mar;119(3):894-906. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252310.87638.ae.
2
A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm.
Surg Innov. 2006 Jun;13(2):86-93. doi: 10.1177/1553350606290529.
3
Exploring the impact of complications on length of stay in major surgery diagnosis-related groups.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Feb;16(1):51-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh008.
4
First experience of endoscopic implantation of tissue expanders in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):513-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9049-1. Epub 2004 Feb 2.
5
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):43-52. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103071.35986.c1.
8
Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome.
Ann Surg. 2002 Dec;236(6):759-66; disscussion 767. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000036269.60340.AE.
9
Tissue expander complications in plastic surgery: a 10-year experience.
Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2002 May-Jun;57(3):93-7. doi: 10.1590/s0041-87812002000300002.
10
Endoscopically assisted reconstruction of male and female poland syndrome.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Apr 15;109(5):1536-43. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200204150-00008.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验