Snohomish County Prosecutors Office, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, M/S 504, Everett, WA 98201, USA.
Arch Sex Behav. 2010 Dec;39(6):1443-7. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9645-9.
The recommendation to include a Paraphilic Coercive Disorder (PCD) diagnosis in the DSM-5 represents an improvement over current options and would lead to the shrinking of the pool of individuals considered for detention as Sexually Violent Predators. A precise description of the diagnostic criteria for PCD would permit psychologists and psychiatrists to use more specific and narrow criteria for those who seek sexual gratification by coercing others to engage in unwanted sexual behavior. This might permit mental health professionals to abandon the Paraphilia NOS designation in favor of the more defined PCD in appropriate cases. Various critics have attacked the proposal on what appears to be misplaced ideological grounds. Not only should ideological concerns not play a part in a scientific debate, but the critics' predictions of how the PCD diagnosis would play out in the legal arena are likely wrong. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder would give the judicial system the best opportunity to most accurately identify the small group of men who have previously committed, and are likely in the future to commit, this type of predatory sexual violence.
将性癖好强迫障碍(Paraphilic Coercive Disorder,PCD)诊断纳入 DSM-5 代表了一种改进,将减少被认为适合作为性暴力犯罪者拘留的人群。对 PCD 诊断标准的准确描述将使心理学家和精神科医生能够为那些通过强迫他人进行非自愿性行为来寻求性满足的人使用更具体和更狭窄的标准。这可能使心理健康专业人员能够放弃性癖好未特定诊断(Paraphilia NOS),转而在适当情况下使用更明确的 PCD 诊断。各种批评者似乎基于错误的意识形态立场对该提案提出了批评。不仅意识形态问题不应该在科学辩论中发挥作用,而且批评者对 PCD 诊断在法律领域的表现的预测也可能是错误的。性癖好强迫障碍将使司法系统有最好的机会准确识别出那些之前犯有此类掠夺性性暴力行为、且未来可能再次犯此类行为的一小部分男性。