Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, 4-12 Hwayang-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 143-729, South Korea.
Neuroradiology. 2011 May;53(5):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0735-0. Epub 2010 Jun 24.
Endovascular coil embolization of very small (maximum dome diameter ≤3 mm) aneurysms is controversial because of a high risk for procedural rupture and technical difficulty. We report clinical and angiographic results of coil embolization of these aneurysms.
From August 2005 through July 2009, 43 very small aneurysms (23 ruptured, 20 unruptured) in 38 patients (12 males, 26 females; mean age, 53 years) were embolized with detachable coils. Of those 38 patients, 24 (63%) presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) from a very small aneurysm (n = 23) or another aneurysm (n = 1). We assessed initial angiographic results, procedural complications, and clinical condition with initial Hunt and Hess grade (HH) and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) at discharge. Follow-up results were evaluated with conventional angiography and/or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).
Initial aneurysmal occlusion was total in 16 (37%), subtotal in 22 (51%), and partial in five (12%) aneurysms. There were five incidents of thrombosis (12%) and one procedural rupture (2%), but there was no definite adverse effect on clinical outcome. Of 24 patients with SAH, ten patients (42%) were in poor condition (HH 3 or 4) at admission. Seventeen of 24 patients (71%) had good or excellent outcome (GOS ≥4) at discharge. A 6-month or more follow-up angiography and/or MRA was available in 33 (11 total and 20 subtotal and 2 partial in initial occlusion) aneurysms (77%) in 28 patients and revealed stable occlusion in 20 aneurysms (61%), progressive total occlusion in 10 (30%), minor recanalization in 2 (6%), and major recanalization in 1 (3%).
Coil embolization of very small aneurysms may be technically feasible with favorable clinical/angiographic outcomes and relatively low recanalization rate during 6 months or more follow-up period.
血管内线圈栓塞非常小的(最大瘤顶直径≤3mm)动脉瘤存在争议,因为其手术过程中破裂的风险较高,且技术难度较大。我们报告了这些动脉瘤的线圈栓塞的临床和血管造影结果。
自 2005 年 8 月至 2009 年 7 月,对 38 例患者(12 例男性,26 例女性;平均年龄 53 岁)的 43 个非常小的动脉瘤(23 个破裂,20 个未破裂)进行了可解脱线圈栓塞。在这 38 例患者中,24 例(63%)因非常小的动脉瘤(n=23)或另一个动脉瘤(n=1)蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)就诊。我们评估了初始血管造影结果、手术并发症以及初始 Hunt 和 Hess 分级(HH)和格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)出院时的临床状况。通过常规血管造影和/或磁共振血管造影(MRA)评估随访结果。
16 个(37%)动脉瘤的初始闭塞完全,22 个(51%)动脉瘤的闭塞次全,5 个(12%)动脉瘤的闭塞不完全。有 5 例血栓形成(12%)和 1 例手术过程中破裂(2%),但对临床结局没有明显的不良影响。24 例蛛网膜下腔出血患者中,10 例(42%)在入院时病情较差(HH3 或 4)。24 例患者中有 17 例(71%)出院时预后良好或优秀(GOS≥4)。28 例患者中有 33 例(11 例完全闭塞、20 例次全闭塞和 2 例部分闭塞)进行了 6 个月或更长时间的随访血管造影和/或 MRA,结果显示 20 例(61%)动脉瘤闭塞稳定,10 例(30%)动脉瘤进展性完全闭塞,2 例(6%)动脉瘤轻微再通,1 例(3%)动脉瘤严重再通。
对于非常小的动脉瘤,线圈栓塞技术上是可行的,具有良好的临床/血管造影结果和相对较低的 6 个月或更长时间的随访期间的再通率。