Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
Hum Mov Sci. 2010 Aug;29(4):502-17. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.05.002. Epub 2010 Jun 23.
In this series of studies on the coordination of the two hands during a bimanual perturbation task, 10 right-handed volunteers were asked to reach to grasp and lift two illuminated cubic objects. Upon initiation of the reach a perturbation could occur by extinguishing one or both objects and illuminating new objects located directly away from the start position in the para-sagittal plane (Experiment 1) or toward the start position in the para-sagittal plane (Experiment 2). In Experiment 2 we also manipulated position of the targets within the visual span by having the targets move toward the midline or away from the midline. Dependent measures included kinematic data for the reach movement as well as the timing of eye movements. Results of both experiments indicated little interference between the hands when one object was perturbed while the other remained stationary. We hypothesize that when visual feedback about limb movement is available, participants can independently reorganize the trajectory of the perturbed limb with minimal interference on the non-perturbed limb. Furthermore, results of Experiment 2 indicated that the position of the targets within the visual span at the final target location dictates the number of eye movements made to acquire both targets and can lead to asynchronies at movement termination in a task-dependent manner. Finally, we found that when targets were perturbed away from the body movement time results indicated a right-hand advantage for dealing with a single perturbation. In contrast, perturbations toward the body abolished the movement time advantage. We suggest that differences in the use of visual feedback when working in the upper versus lower visual fields may influence hand advantages.
在这项关于双手在双手扰动任务中的协调性的系列研究中,要求 10 名右利手志愿者伸手去抓并提起两个发光的立方物体。在伸手开始时,一个扰动可以通过熄灭一个或两个物体并照亮位于起始位置直接远离矢状面的新物体(实验 1)或朝向矢状面起始位置的新物体(实验 2)来发生。在实验 2 中,我们还通过使目标向中线移动或远离中线来操纵目标在视觉范围内的位置。依赖度量包括伸手运动的运动学数据以及眼球运动的时间。两个实验的结果都表明,当一个物体受到干扰而另一个物体保持静止时,双手之间几乎没有干扰。我们假设,当肢体运动的视觉反馈可用时,参与者可以独立地重新组织受干扰肢体的轨迹,而对未受干扰的肢体的干扰最小。此外,实验 2 的结果表明,在最终目标位置的视觉范围内目标的位置决定了获取两个目标所需的眼球运动次数,并可能导致任务相关的运动终止时的异步。最后,我们发现当目标从身体移动时,结果表明单手处理单个扰动具有右手优势。相比之下,向身体的扰动会消除运动时间优势。我们认为,在使用上半视野和下半视野时视觉反馈的使用差异可能会影响手的优势。