School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.
J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2010 Jul 15;878(22):1946-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.05.030. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
The post-digestion (18)O labeling method decouples protein digestion and peptide labeling. This method allows labeling conditions to be optimized separately and increases labeling efficiency. A common method for protein denaturation in proteomics is the use of urea. Though some previous studies have used urea-based protein denaturation before post-digestion (18)O labeling, the optimal (18)O labeling conditions in this case have not been yet reported. Present study investigated the effects of urea concentration and pH on the labeling efficiency and obtained an optimized protocol. It was demonstrated that urea inhibited (18)O incorporation depending on concentration. However, a urea concentration between 1 and 2M had minimal effects on labeling. It was also demonstrated that the use of FA to quench the digestion reaction severely affected the labeling efficiency. This study revealed the reason why previous studies gave different optimal pH for labeling. They neglect the effects of different digestion conditions on the labeling conditions. Excellent labeling quality was obtained at the optimized conditions using urea 1-2 M and pH 4.5, 98.4+/-1.9% for a standard protein mixture and 97.2+/-6.2% for a complex biological sample. For a 1:1 mixture analysis of the (16)O- and (18)O-labeled peptides from the same protein sample, the average abundance ratios reached 1.05+/-0.31, demonstrating a good quantitation quality at the optimized conditions. This work will benefit other researchers who pair urea-based protein denaturation with a post-digestion (18)O labeling method.
酶解后(18)O 标记方法将蛋白质酶解和肽段标记分离开来。这种方法可以分别优化标记条件,提高标记效率。蛋白质组学中常用的蛋白质变性方法是使用尿素。尽管之前的一些研究在酶解后(18)O 标记之前使用基于尿素的蛋白质变性,但这种情况下的最佳(18)O 标记条件尚未报道。本研究调查了尿素浓度和 pH 值对标记效率的影响,并获得了优化的方案。结果表明,尿素的抑制作用取决于浓度。然而,1 到 2M 的尿素浓度对标记的影响最小。还表明,使用 FA 猝灭消化反应严重影响标记效率。本研究揭示了为什么以前的研究对标记给出不同的最佳 pH 值的原因。他们忽略了不同消化条件对标记条件的影响。在优化条件下使用 1-2M 的尿素和 pH 值 4.5 时,获得了优异的标记质量,标准蛋白质混合物的标记质量为 98.4+/-1.9%,复杂生物样品的标记质量为 97.2+/-6.2%。对于同一蛋白质样品中(16)O-和(18)O 标记肽的 1:1 混合物分析,平均丰度比达到 1.05+/-0.31,表明在优化条件下具有良好的定量质量。这项工作将使其他将基于尿素的蛋白质变性与酶解后(18)O 标记方法结合使用的研究人员受益。