University of Rochester James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Sep;40(3):379-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.12.024. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
Previous research has shown that the effectiveness of acupressure bands in reducing chemotherapy-related nausea is related to patients' expectations of efficacy.
To test whether an informational manipulation designed to increase expectation of efficacy regarding acupressure bands would enhance their effectiveness.
We conducted an exploratory, four-arm, randomized clinical trial in breast cancer patients about to begin chemotherapy. All patients received acupressure bands and a relaxation CD. This report focuses on Arm 1(expectancy-neutral informational handout and CD) compared with Arm 4 (expectancy-enhancing handout and CD). Randomization was stratified according to the patient's level of certainty that she would have treatment-induced nausea (two levels: high and low). Experience of nausea and use of antiemetics were assessed with a five-day diary.
Our expectancy-enhancing manipulation resulted in improved control of nausea in the 26 patients with high nausea expectancies but lessened control of nausea in 27 patients having low nausea expectancies. This interaction effect (between expected nausea and intervention effectiveness) approached statistical significance for our analysis of average nausea (P=0.084) and reached statistical significance for our analysis of peak nausea (P=0.030). Patients receiving the expectancy-enhancing manipulation took fewer antiemetic pills outside the clinic (mean(enhanced)=12.6; mean(neutral)=18.5, P=0.003).
This exploratory intervention reduced antiemetic use overall and also reduced nausea in patients who had high levels of expected nausea. Interestingly, it increased nausea in patients who had low expectancies for nausea. Confirmatory research is warranted.
先前的研究表明,按压腕带在减轻化疗相关恶心方面的有效性与患者对疗效的期望有关。
检验一种旨在增强对按压腕带疗效期望的信息操作是否会提高其效果。
我们开展了一项在即将开始化疗的乳腺癌患者中进行的探索性、四臂、随机临床试验。所有患者均接受按压腕带和放松 CD。本报告重点介绍 Arm 1(期望中性信息手册和 CD)与 Arm 4(期望增强手册和 CD)相比。随机化按患者对治疗引起的恶心的确定性水平分层(两个水平:高和低)。使用为期五天的日记评估恶心体验和止吐药的使用情况。
我们的期望增强操作导致 26 名预期恶心程度较高的患者控制恶心的效果得到改善,但降低了 27 名预期恶心程度较低的患者控制恶心的效果。这种交互效应(预期恶心和干预效果之间)接近我们对平均恶心分析的统计学意义(P=0.084),并达到我们对峰值恶心分析的统计学意义(P=0.030)。接受期望增强操作的患者在诊所外服用的止吐药较少(增强组平均值为 12.6;中性组平均值为 18.5,P=0.003)。
这项探索性干预措施总体上减少了止吐药的使用,还减轻了预期恶心程度较高的患者的恶心程度。有趣的是,它增加了预期恶心程度较低的患者的恶心程度。需要进行确认性研究。