Suppr超能文献

["评分"——益处与陷阱]

["Scoring"--benefits and pitfalls].

作者信息

Inglis R, Windolf J, Pannike A

机构信息

Klinikum Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität Frankfurt.

出版信息

Unfallchirurgie. 1991 Apr;17(2):118-21. doi: 10.1007/BF02639184.

Abstract

Problems of calculations and predictions on more than two particles moving are known in mathematics and physics since a long time already. However in medicine as there is lack of knowledge about the complexity of the pathophysiological behaviour of "systems" doctors tend to invent scores, scales and indices to make parameters more intelligible to them without concern on underlying interdependencies and redundancies. There is nothing to say against this kind of proceeding as long as the resulting data are not processed statistically. However, since the personal computer was invented there was and especially today is no need to summarize data any longer to gain the degree of understanding, in the contrary, the only data that really count are those that are processed correctly according to statistics, and thus doctors do not have to keep an eye any longer on incomplete intermediate results.

摘要

关于两个以上粒子运动的计算和预测问题,在数学和物理学领域早已为人所知。然而在医学领域,由于缺乏对“系统”病理生理行为复杂性的认识,医生们倾向于发明分数、量表和指数,以使参数对他们来说更易于理解,而不考虑潜在的相互依存关系和冗余性。只要所得数据不进行统计处理,这种做法无可厚非。然而,自从个人计算机发明以来,尤其是在当今时代,不再需要为了获得理解程度而对数据进行汇总,相反,唯一真正重要的数据是那些根据统计学正确处理的数据,因此医生不必再关注不完整的中间结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验