• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床变量、神经心理学表现以及 SLC6A4 和 COMT 基因多态性在预测氟西汀治疗重度抑郁症的早期反应中的作用。

The role of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance and SLC6A4 and COMT gene polymorphisms on the prediction of early response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Clínica de Enfermedades Crónicas y Procedimientos Especiales CECYPE, Morelia, Mich., Mexico.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2010 Dec;127(1-3):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.002
PMID:20584552
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is treated with antidepressants, but only between 50% and 70% of the patients respond to the initial treatment. Several authors suggested different factors that could predict antidepressant response, including clinical, psychophysiological, neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and genetic variables. However, these different predictors present poor prognostic sensitivity and specificity by themselves. The aim of our work is to study the possible role of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance, and the 5HTTLPR, rs25531, and val108/58Met COMT polymorphisms in the prediction of the response to fluoxetine after 4weeks of treatment in a sample of patient with MDD.

METHODS

64 patients with MDD were genotyped according to the above-mentioned polymorphisms, and were clinically and neuropsychologically assessed before a 4-week fluoxetine treatment. Fluoxetine response was assessed by using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. We carried out a binary logistic regression model for the potential predictive variables.

RESULTS

Out of the clinical variables studied, only the number of anxiety disorders comorbid with MDD have predicted a poor response to the treatment. A combination of a good performance in variables of attention and low performance in planning could predict a good response to fluoxetine in patients with MDD. None of the genetic variables studied had predictive value in our model.

LIMITATIONS

The possible placebo effect has not been controlled. Our study is focused on response prediction but not in remission prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our work suggests that the combination of the number of comorbid anxiety disorders, an attentional variable, and two planning variables makes it possible to correctly classify 82% of the depressed patients who responded to the treatment with fluoxetine, and 74% of the patients who did not respond to that treatment.

摘要

介绍

重度抑郁症(MDD)的治疗方法是使用抗抑郁药,但只有 50%到 70%的患者对初始治疗有反应。几位作者提出了不同的可以预测抗抑郁反应的因素,包括临床、心理生理、神经心理学、神经影像学和遗传变量。然而,这些不同的预测因素本身的预后敏感性和特异性都较差。我们的工作旨在研究临床变量、神经心理学表现以及 5HTTLPR、rs25531 和 val108/58Met COMT 多态性在预测 MDD 患者接受氟西汀治疗 4 周后的反应中的可能作用。

方法

根据上述多态性对 64 例 MDD 患者进行基因分型,并在接受氟西汀治疗前 4 周进行临床和神经心理学评估。使用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表评估氟西汀的反应。我们对潜在预测变量进行了二元逻辑回归模型分析。

结果

在所研究的临床变量中,只有与 MDD 共病的焦虑障碍数量预测了对治疗的不良反应。注意力变量表现良好和计划能力表现不佳的组合可以预测 MDD 患者对氟西汀的良好反应。研究中没有遗传变量具有预测价值。

局限性

未控制可能的安慰剂效应。我们的研究侧重于预测反应,而不是预测缓解。

结论

我们的工作表明,共病焦虑障碍的数量、注意力变量和两个计划变量的组合可以正确分类 82%对氟西汀治疗有反应的抑郁患者,以及 74%对该治疗无反应的患者。

相似文献

1
The role of clinical variables, neuropsychological performance and SLC6A4 and COMT gene polymorphisms on the prediction of early response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.临床变量、神经心理学表现以及 SLC6A4 和 COMT 基因多态性在预测氟西汀治疗重度抑郁症的早期反应中的作用。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Dec;127(1-3):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
2
Psychic and somatic anxiety symptoms as predictors of response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.精神性和躯体性焦虑症状作为重度抑郁症患者对氟西汀反应的预测指标
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Oct 30;161(1):116-20. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
3
Brain derived neurotrophic factor gene polymorphism (Val66Met) and short-term antidepressant response in major depressive disorder.脑源性神经营养因子基因多态性(Val66Met)与重性抑郁障碍的短期抗抑郁反应。
J Affect Disord. 2010 Nov;126(3):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.07.006. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
4
Early improvements in anxiety, depression, and anger/hostility symptoms and response to antidepressant treatment.焦虑、抑郁及愤怒/敌意症状的早期改善以及对抗抑郁治疗的反应。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;22(3):166-71.
5
Residual symptoms after remission of major depressive disorder with fluoxetine and risk of relapse.氟西汀治疗缓解后的重度抑郁症残留症状与复发风险。
Depress Anxiety. 2011 Feb;28(2):137-44. doi: 10.1002/da.20768. Epub 2010 Dec 13.
6
Prediction of the time-course pattern of remission in depression by using clinical, neuropsychological, and genetic variables.使用临床、神经心理学和遗传变量预测抑郁症缓解的时程模式。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):1082-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.04.024. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
7
Problem-solving ability and comorbid personality disorders in depressed outpatients.抑郁症门诊患者的问题解决能力与共病性人格障碍
Depress Anxiety. 2006;23(8):496-501. doi: 10.1002/da.20194.
8
Prediction of remission of depression with clinical variables, neuropsychological performance, and serotonergic/dopaminergic gene polymorphisms.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012 Nov;27(6):577-86. doi: 10.1002/hup.2267.
9
Hopelessness as a predictor of non-response to fluoxetine in major depressive disorder.绝望作为重度抑郁症患者对氟西汀无反应的预测指标。
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Mar;19(1):5-8. doi: 10.1080/10401230601163451.
10
The impact of catechol-O-methyltransferase SNPs and haplotypes on treatment response phenotypes in major depressive disorder: a case-control association study.儿茶酚-O-甲基转移酶单核苷酸多态性和单倍型对重性抑郁障碍治疗反应表型的影响:病例对照关联研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jul;25(4):218-27. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e328338b884.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive Function as a Predictor of Short-Term Pharmacological Treatment Response in Major Depressive Disorder: Mediating Effect of Mentalization.认知功能作为重度抑郁症短期药物治疗反应的预测指标:心理化的中介作用。
Psychiatry Investig. 2025 May;22(5):522-530. doi: 10.30773/pi.2024.0203. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Prediction of Antidepressant Efficacy by Cognitive Function in First-Episode Late-Life Depression: A Pilot Study.认知功能对首发老年晚期抑郁症抗抑郁疗效的预测:一项初步研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 20;13:916041. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.916041. eCollection 2022.
3
The association between serotonin-related gene polymorphisms and susceptibility and early sertraline response in patients with panic disorder.
血清素相关基因多态性与惊恐障碍患者的易感性和早期舍曲林反应的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 28;20(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02790-y.
4
Pretreatment Reward Sensitivity and Frontostriatal Resting-State Functional Connectivity Are Associated With Response to Bupropion After Sertraline Nonresponse.治疗前的奖赏敏感性和额-纹状体静息态功能连接与舍曲林治疗无反应后改用安非他酮的反应相关。
Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 15;88(8):657-667. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
A Systematic Review of Cognitive Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Major Depression.重度抑郁症治疗结果认知预测因素的系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 28;9:382. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00382. eCollection 2018.
6
Longitudinal Estimation of the Clinically Significant Change in the Treatment of Major Depression Disorder.重度抑郁症治疗中具有临床意义变化的纵向估计
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 6;9:1406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01406. eCollection 2018.
7
Neural and Behavioral Predictors of Treatment Efficacy on Mood Symptoms and Cognition in Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review.情绪障碍中情绪症状和认知功能治疗效果的神经及行为预测因素:一项系统评价
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 26;9:337. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00337. eCollection 2018.
8
Pharmacogenetics and Imaging-Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Response: Towards Translational Strategies.抗抑郁反应的药物遗传学与影像药物遗传学:迈向转化策略
CNS Drugs. 2016 Dec;30(12):1169-1189. doi: 10.1007/s40263-016-0385-9.
9
Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) polymorphisms are associated with response to fluoxetine in south Indian major depressive disorder patients.血清素转运体基因(SLC6A4)多态性与南印度重度抑郁症患者对氟西汀的反应相关。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;72(10):1215-1220. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2099-9. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
10
Toward an online cognitive and emotional battery to predict treatment remission in depression.迈向用于预测抑郁症治疗缓解情况的在线认知与情感测试组合。
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015 Feb 26;11:517-31. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S75975. eCollection 2015.