• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部和区域性放射治疗的乳腺癌女性中,淋巴结照射和分割大小对心脑血管死亡率的影响。

Effect of nodal irradiation and fraction size on cardiac and cerebrovascular mortality in women with breast cancer treated with local and locoregional radiotherapy.

机构信息

Division of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Radiotherapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jun 1;80(2):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.041. Epub 2010 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.041
PMID:20584587
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether the adjuvant breast cancer radiation volume or fraction size (>2 Gy vs. ≤2 Gy) affected the risk of fatal cardiac or cerebrovascular (CCV) events and to determine whether the addition of regional radiotherapy (RT) increased the risk of fatal cerebrovascular events compared with breast/chest wall RT alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Overall survival was compared for patients receiving breast/chest wall RT alone or breast/chest wall plus regional node RT (BRCW+NRT) in a population-based cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer who had undergone RT between 1990 and 1996. The effect of laterality, age, systemic therapy, radiation volume, and fraction size on the risk of fatal CCV events was analyzed using a competing risk method.

RESULTS

A total of 4,929 women underwent adjuvant RT. The median follow-up was 11.7 years. BRCW+NRT was associated with an increased risk of CCV death at 12 years (5% for BRCW+NRT vs. 3.5% for breast/chest wall RT alone; p = .004), but the fraction size was not (3.92% for a fraction size >2 Gy vs. 3.54% for a fraction size <2 Gy; p = .83). The 12-year absolute risk of death from stroke alone did not differ for either radiation volume (1.17% for BRCW+NRT vs. 0.8% for breast/chest wall RT alone; p = .22) or fraction size (p = .59).

CONCLUSION

Regional RT was associated with a small (1.5% at 12 years), but statistically significant, increased risk of death from a CCV event. The addition of regional RT did not significantly increase the risk of death from stroke, although the number of events was small. An increased fraction size was not significantly associated with a greater risk of fatal CCV events. These data support the continued use of hypofractionated adjuvant regional RT.

摘要

目的

确定辅助乳腺癌放疗体积或分次剂量(>2Gy 与≤2Gy)是否会影响致命性心脑血管(CCV)事件的风险,并确定与单纯乳腺/胸壁放疗(BRCW+NRT)相比,区域放疗(RT)的加入是否会增加致命性脑血管事件的风险。

方法和材料

对 1990 年至 1996 年间接受辅助放疗的早期乳腺癌女性进行了基于人群的队列研究,比较了仅接受乳腺/胸壁放疗(BRCW+NRT)或乳腺/胸壁加区域淋巴结放疗(BRCW+NRT)的患者的总生存率。使用竞争风险方法分析了侧别、年龄、全身治疗、放疗体积和分次剂量对致命性 CCV 事件风险的影响。

结果

共有 4929 名女性接受了辅助放疗。中位随访时间为 11.7 年。BRCW+NRT 与 12 年时 CCV 死亡风险增加相关(BRCW+NRT 为 5%,BRCW+NRT 为 3.5%;p=0.004),但分次剂量无关(分次剂量>2Gy 为 3.92%,分次剂量<2Gy 为 3.54%;p=0.83)。BRCW+NRT 与单纯乳腺/胸壁 RT 相比,12 年时单独死于卒中的绝对风险无差异(BRCW+NRT 为 1.17%,单纯乳腺/胸壁 RT 为 0.8%;p=0.22),或分次剂量(p=0.59)。

结论

区域 RT 与较小(12 年时为 1.5%)但具有统计学意义的 CCV 事件死亡风险增加相关。尽管事件数量较少,但区域 RT 的加入并未显著增加卒中死亡的风险。增加分次剂量与致命性 CCV 事件的风险增加无显著相关性。这些数据支持继续使用低分割辅助区域 RT。

相似文献

1
Effect of nodal irradiation and fraction size on cardiac and cerebrovascular mortality in women with breast cancer treated with local and locoregional radiotherapy.局部和区域性放射治疗的乳腺癌女性中,淋巴结照射和分割大小对心脑血管死亡率的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jun 1;80(2):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.041. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
2
Impact of fraction size on cardiac mortality in women treated with tangential radiotherapy for localized breast cancer.分次剂量对局部乳腺癌切线放疗女性患者心脏死亡率的影响。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Oct 1;69(2):483-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.033. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
3
Patients with t1 to t2 breast cancer with one to three positive nodes have higher local and regional recurrence risks compared with node-negative patients after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast radiotherapy.与保乳手术和全乳放疗后的无淋巴结转移患者相比,有1至3个阳性淋巴结的T1至T2期乳腺癌患者有更高的局部和区域复发风险。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):357-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.034.
4
Can the addition of regional radiotherapy counterbalance important risk factors in breast cancer patients with extracapsular invasion of axillary lymph node metastases?对于存在腋窝淋巴结转移包膜外侵犯的乳腺癌患者,加用局部放疗能否抵消重要的危险因素?
Strahlenther Onkol. 2003 Oct;179(10):661-6. doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-1084-2.
5
Supraclavicular radiation for breast cancer does not increase the 10-year risk of stroke.乳腺癌锁骨上放疗不会增加10年中风风险。
Cancer. 2006 Jun 15;106(12):2556-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21943.
6
[Evidence-based radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer: results in the 1990-ies].[基于证据的放射治疗在可手术乳腺癌治疗中的应用:20世纪90年代的结果]
Orv Hetil. 2000 Jul 9;141(28):1551-5.
7
Postmastectomy electron-beam-rotation irradiation in locally advanced breast cancer prognostic factors of locoregional tumor control.局部晚期乳腺癌保乳术后电子束旋转照射局部区域肿瘤控制的预后因素
Strahlenther Onkol. 2002 Nov;178(11):624-32. doi: 10.1007/s00066-002-1012-x.
8
Locoregional failure 15 years after mastectomy in women with one to three positive axillary nodes with or without irradiation the significance of tumor size.有1至3个腋窝淋巴结阳性的女性在乳房切除术后15年的局部区域复发情况:无论是否接受放疗,肿瘤大小的意义
Strahlenther Onkol. 2003 Mar;179(3):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-1010-7.
9
Late cardiac mortality and morbidity in early-stage breast cancer patients after breast-conservation treatment.早期乳腺癌患者保乳治疗后的晚期心脏死亡率和发病率
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 1;24(25):4100-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1037. Epub 2006 Aug 14.
10
Chest wall radiotherapy: middle ground for treatment of patients with one to three positive lymph nodes after mastectomy.胸壁放疗:乳房切除术后1至3个阳性淋巴结患者治疗的中间立场。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Dec 1;75(5):1297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy: An ASTRO/ASCO/SSO Clinical Practice Guideline.乳房切除术后放射治疗:美国放射肿瘤学会/美国临床肿瘤学会/美国外科学会临床实践指南
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep 16. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-18057-3.
2
Increased risk of cerebrovascular mortality in head and neck cancer survivors aged ≥ 65 years treated with definitive radiotherapy: a population-based cohort study.≥65 岁头颈部癌症幸存者接受根治性放疗后脑血管死亡风险增加:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Radiat Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;16(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13014-021-01913-3.
3
Variation in the use of radiotherapy fractionation for breast cancer: Survival outcome and cost implications.
乳腺癌放疗分割方式的差异:生存结果和成本影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Nov;152:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.07.038. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
4
Comparing hypofractionated to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in postmastectomy breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.比较保乳术后乳腺癌的亚分次放疗与常规分次放疗:荟萃分析和系统评价。
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-1463-1.
5
Which target volume should be considered when irradiating the regional nodes in breast cancer? Results of a network-meta-analysis.在乳腺癌放疗中应考虑照射哪些区域淋巴结?一项网络荟萃分析的结果。
Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun 11;14(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1280-6.
6
Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk After Radiotherapy in Women With Breast Cancer.乳腺癌女性放疗后的长期心血管风险
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 May 21;6(5):e005633. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005633.
7
A Study on Dosimetric Outcomes and Acute Toxicity of Post Mastectomy Adjuvant Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer.乳腺癌乳房切除术后辅助性大分割放疗的剂量学结果及急性毒性研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jul;10(7):XC05-XC08. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/20477.8146. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
8
Long-term Mortality in 43 763 U.S. Radiologists Compared with 64 990 U.S. Psychiatrists.43763名美国放射科医生与64990名美国精神科医生的长期死亡率比较
Radiology. 2016 Dec;281(3):847-857. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016152472. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
9
Hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy: current perspectives.大分割全乳放疗:当前观点
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2015 Oct 27;7:363-70. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S81710. eCollection 2015.
10
(18)F-FDG PET imaging in detection of radiation-induced vascular disease in lymphoma survivors.(18)18F-FDG PET成像在淋巴瘤幸存者放射性血管疾病检测中的应用
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jun 15;5(4):408-15. eCollection 2015.