CCF Lerner College of Medicine of CWRU, 28099 Gates Mills Blvd, Pepper Pike, OH 44124, USA.
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010 Oct;11(14):2351-62. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2010.499126.
Kidney cancer is the ninth most common cancer in the USA, with an annual incidence of approximately 55,000 cases per year. Over 13,000 patients are estimated to die from this disease annually. Cloning of the VHL gene, recognition of the associated abnormalities in sporadic clear-cell carcinoma, and its role as a regulator of the hypoxic response, were important milestones in our understanding of renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) biology and the recognition of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) dependency of RCC. A variety of clinical features, including histologic features, prognostic factors, and patient history of comorbid illness, provide the framework in which the results of recent clinical trials and regulatory approvals of these agents are utilized to develop treatment recommendations for the largest metastatic patient RCC group, the therapy naïve individual.
The rationale for use of VEGF-targeted therapy in advanced RCC patients and the recently developed treatment options for these individuals are reviewed. Regulatory approval of sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic RCC (mRCC), was followed by the approval of sunitinib, temsirolimus, bevacizumab plus interferon (IFNα), everolimus, and--most recently--pazopanib. These licences were granted from late 2005 through late 2009, a very short span of 4 years. In treatment-naïve mRCC patients, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, bevacizumab + IFNα, and temsirolimus were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Medicines Agency (EMEA). The clinical trials and data supporting these approvals are reviewed.
This review examines these developments and provides the reader an overview and understanding of available current systemic therapy options for treatment-naïve mRCC patients.
As multiple treatment options are now available for treatment-naïve mRCC patients, an understanding of how to utilize this group of agents is required. The use of various clinical features allows a rational approach to therapy selection. These features include prior treatment status, histologic subtype, and prognostic group. Further refinement of therapy selection is required and will require further biologic information as well as comparative randomized trials.
肾癌是美国第九最常见的癌症,每年的发病率约为 55000 例。据估计,每年有超过 13000 例患者死于这种疾病。VHL 基因的克隆,识别散发性透明细胞癌相关的异常,并作为一个调节缺氧反应,是在我们的理解肾细胞癌 (RCC) 的生物学和识别的血管内皮生长因子 (VEGF) 的依赖性 RCC 的重要里程碑。各种临床特征,包括组织学特征、预后因素和患者合并症的病史,为最近临床试验的结果和这些药物的监管批准提供了框架,用于制定最大转移性患者 RCC 群体的治疗建议,即治疗初治个体。
在晚期 RCC 患者中使用 VEGF 靶向治疗的基本原理和最近为这些患者开发的治疗选择进行了回顾。索拉非尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌 (mRCC) 的监管批准后,随后批准了舒尼替尼、替西罗莫司、贝伐单抗联合干扰素 (IFNα)、依维莫司和——最近——帕唑帕尼。这些许可证是在 2005 年底到 2009 年底获得的,时间非常短,只有 4 年。在初治 mRCC 患者中,舒尼替尼、索拉非尼、帕唑帕尼、贝伐单抗+IFNα 和替西罗莫司被美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 和/或欧洲药品管理局 (EMEA) 批准。回顾了支持这些批准的临床试验和数据。
这篇综述审查了这些进展,并为读者提供了一个概述和了解初治 mRCC 患者的可用当前系统治疗选择。
由于现在有多种治疗选择可用于初治 mRCC 患者,因此需要了解如何使用这组药物。各种临床特征的使用允许对治疗选择进行合理的方法。这些特征包括既往治疗状况、组织学亚型和预后组。需要进一步细化治疗选择,并将需要进一步的生物学信息以及比较随机试验。