Suppr超能文献

半月板切除术患者临床结局的系统评价。

A systematic review of clinical outcomes in patients undergoing meniscectomy.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2010 Sep;38(9):1907-16. doi: 10.1177/0363546510370196. Epub 2010 Jun 29.

Abstract

Knee meniscectomy is the most common procedure performed by orthopaedic surgeons. While it is generally believed that loss of meniscal tissue leads to osteoarthritis and poor knee function, many variables may significantly influence this outcome. Through literature search engines including PubMed and Ovid, 4 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective cohorts, and 23 retrospective cohorts that fit the criteria for level I, II, and III level of evidence were included in this systematic review. For the level III evidence studies, follow-up of 5 years or more was required. Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of poor clinical or radiographic outcomes included total meniscectomy or removal of the peripheral meniscal rim, lateral meniscectomy, degenerative meniscal tears, presence of chondral damage, presence of hand osteoarthritis suggestive of genetic predisposition, and increased body mass index. Variables that were not predictive of outcome or were inconclusive or had mixed results included meniscal tear pattern, age, mechanical alignment, sex of patient, activity level, and meniscal tears associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. While an intact meniscus or meniscal repair was generally favorable in the ACL-reconstructed knees, meniscal repair of degenerative meniscal tissue was not favorable. There is a lack of uniformity in the literature on this subject with a preponderance of lower level evidence. Although randomized controlled trials are considered to be the gold standard in medical research, a multicenter prospective cohort design may be more appropriate in assessing the long-term outcome of meniscal surgery and the role that multiple preoperative and intraoperative variables may play in clinical outcomes. In addition, future studies should include factors not assessed or adequately evaluated by several of the included studies, such as meniscal tear pattern, age, mechanical alignment, sex of the patient, activity level, meniscal tears associated with other injuries such as the ACL, smoking, and the effect of previous surgery.

摘要

膝关节半月板切除术是矫形外科医生最常进行的手术。虽然人们普遍认为半月板组织的丧失会导致骨关节炎和膝关节功能不良,但许多变量可能会显著影响这一结果。通过包括 PubMed 和 Ovid 在内的文献搜索引擎,纳入了 4 项随机对照试验、2 项前瞻性队列研究和 23 项符合 I 级、II 级和 III 级证据水平标准的回顾性队列研究。对于 III 级证据研究,需要随访 5 年或以上。术前和术中预测不良临床或影像学结果的因素包括全半月板切除术或半月板外周缘切除术、外侧半月板切除术、退行性半月板撕裂、软骨损伤、存在提示遗传倾向的手骨关节炎、以及体重指数增加。不能预测结果或结果不确定或结果不一致的变量包括半月板撕裂模式、年龄、机械对线、患者性别、活动水平以及与前交叉韧带 (ACL) 重建相关的半月板撕裂。虽然 ACL 重建后的膝关节中半月板完整或半月板修复通常是有利的,但退行性半月板组织的半月板修复并不有利。关于这个主题的文献缺乏一致性,主要是低水平的证据。虽然随机对照试验被认为是医学研究的金标准,但多中心前瞻性队列设计可能更适合评估半月板手术的长期结果以及多个术前和术中变量在临床结果中的作用。此外,未来的研究应包括一些纳入研究未评估或充分评估的因素,如半月板撕裂模式、年龄、机械对线、患者性别、活动水平、与其他损伤(如 ACL)相关的半月板撕裂、吸烟以及先前手术的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验