Schüttler J, Schüttler M, Kloos S, Nadstawek J, Schwilden H
Institut für Anaesthesiologie, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn.
Anaesthesist. 1991 Apr;40(4):199-204.
The combination of propofol and ketamine for total intravenous anesthesia was investigated; the intention was to minimize the side effects of each drug by the concomitant application of the other drug. METHODS. Twenty patients scheduled for lower abdominal interventions were divided into two groups. In the first group anesthesia was induced and maintained by a simple administration regimen based upon pharmacokinetic principles. Ketamine and propofol were given as bolus injections (60 mg each) with a time interval of 60 s for induction followed by a two-step infusion regimen for propofol (15.5 mg/min) and later on by an additional ketamine infusion (1-2 mg/min). Bolus injections (20 mg) of ketamine were administered to increase the depth of anesthesia if necessary (Fig. 1). The second group received propofol and ketamine by microprocessor-controlled infusion pumps requiring the anesthetist to operate a single dial to preset the desired blood levels of both drugs according to the needs of the individual patient (Fig. 2). RESULTS. There were no difference (Table 1) between the two groups in the demographic data of the patients or duration of surgery (30-120 min). The total doses of propofol (750 +/- 262 vs 624 +/- 468 mg) and ketamine (158 +/- 41 vs 99 +/- 48 mg) were smaller in the computer-controlled infusion group, though this difference just failed to be significant. The hemodynamic changes during induction were minor, with a small nonsignificant increase in all parameters (Fig. 3) for 10 min. The controllability of the pharmacodynamic effects of both drugs during anesthesia was very satisfactory in the computer-assisted infusion group and quite satisfactory in the first group. There were no psychic disturbances during induction of or recovery from anesthesia. Respiration was adequate within a few minutes after the end of surgery. The patients were awake about 10 min later and fully oriented after 20 min. No major side effects were observed with this anesthetic technique. CONCLUSION. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and ketamine proved to be very satisfactory from a clinical point of view. The major known side effects of propofol (reduced hemodynamics during induction) and ketamine (psychic disturbances and cardiovascular stimulation) were absent and respiratory function was adequate after the end of surgery. This technique, therefore, can be used in risk patients and under disaster conditions when i.v. access is the only possible route of drug administration. The use of computer-assisted infusion pumps markedly enhances handling and controllability of total i.v. anesthesia.
研究了丙泊酚与氯胺酮联合用于全静脉麻醉的情况;目的是通过同时使用另一种药物来尽量减少每种药物的副作用。方法:将20例计划进行下腹部手术的患者分为两组。第一组采用基于药代动力学原理的简单给药方案诱导和维持麻醉。氯胺酮和丙泊酚均以推注方式给药(各60mg),诱导时时间间隔为60秒,随后采用丙泊酚两步输注方案(15.5mg/分钟),之后再额外输注氯胺酮(1 - 2mg/分钟)。必要时给予氯胺酮推注(20mg)以加深麻醉深度(图1)。第二组通过微处理器控制的输注泵给予丙泊酚和氯胺酮,麻醉医生只需操作一个刻度盘,根据患者个体需求预设两种药物的目标血药浓度(图2)。结果:两组患者的人口统计学数据或手术时长(30 - 120分钟)无差异(表1)。计算机控制输注组的丙泊酚总剂量(750±262mg对624±468mg)和氯胺酮总剂量(158±41mg对99±48mg)较小,不过这一差异刚未达到显著水平。诱导期间的血流动力学变化较小,所有参数在10分钟内有小幅非显著性升高(图3)。在计算机辅助输注组中,麻醉期间两种药物的药效学效应可控性非常令人满意,第一组也相当令人满意。麻醉诱导或苏醒过程中未出现精神障碍。手术结束后几分钟内呼吸功能正常。患者约10分钟后苏醒,20分钟后定向力完全恢复。该麻醉技术未观察到重大副作用。结论:从临床角度来看,丙泊酚与氯胺酮全静脉麻醉效果非常令人满意。丙泊酚的主要已知副作用(诱导期间血流动力学降低)和氯胺酮的主要已知副作用(精神障碍和心血管刺激)均未出现,手术结束后呼吸功能正常。因此,该技术可用于高危患者以及在灾难情况下,当静脉给药是唯一可行的给药途径时。使用计算机辅助输注泵显著提高了全静脉麻醉的操作便利性和可控性。