Brant Jeannine M
Billings Clinic Cancer Center, Billings, Montana, USA.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11 Suppl 1:7-12.
Pain is a significant problem in patients with cancer. Pain occurs in approximately 50% of patients at some point during the disease process and in up to 75% of patients with advanced cancer. Total pain impacts quality of life domains including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual realms. Unfortunately, pain is underappreciated and undermanaged throughout the world. Lack of knowledge among healthcare professionals, inadequate pain assessment, fears of addiction, and beliefs that pain is an inevitable component of cancer are common barriers. Education about comprehensive pain assessment and optimal management strategies and discussions about belief systems regarding pain can assist to bridge the gap between suffering and comfort. Self-report is the gold standard for pain assessment. Gathering information about the location(s), intensity, quality and temporal factors is essential. Intensity should be quantified on a rating scale to determine the amount of pain and the degree of relief from interventions. Quality can be used to diagnose the specific pain syndrome. Temporal factors provide input about how the pain is experienced over time and can offer input into the pain management plan of care. For patients who cannot self-report pain, non-verbal assessment tools are available to aid in assessment. The World Health Organization's Analgesic Ladder provides a template for the management of cancer pain. For step 1, pain can be managed with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and other nonopioid analgesics. As pain persists or increases, step 2 involves managing pain with select opioids for mild to moderate pain along with NSAIDS and nonopioid analgesics. Step 3 of the ladder is applicable to many cancer pain syndromes, and includes opioids for moderate to severe pain in conjunction with NSAIDS and nonopioids. This 3 step approach can be 80-90% effective. This polypharmaceutical employed with behavioral complimentary techniques are often employed to interrupt pain along the physiological pathways during transduction, transmission, perception, and modulation. Severe cancer pain that is not managed with the Step 3 approach, deserves special attention and unique strategies for control. When pain control is inadequate or if side effects are intolerable, a change of opioid or a change in the route of administration is recommended. Intraspinal analgesics can be trialed in patients who have intractable pain or intolerable side effects with systemic opioids. This route is especially helpful in neuropathic pain syndromes located at the trunk level or below. Opioid doses in all patients with intractable pain should be titrated judiciously for optimal relief with a balance of toxicity management. Other strategies for intractable pain should be investigated including nerve blocks and neuroablation. The overall goal for patients is to attain comfort with minimal side effects and optimal quality of life.
疼痛是癌症患者面临的一个重大问题。在疾病过程中的某个阶段,约50%的患者会出现疼痛,而在晚期癌症患者中,这一比例高达75%。全面疼痛会影响包括身体、心理、社会和精神领域在内的生活质量方面。不幸的是,疼痛在全球范围内都未得到充分重视和妥善管理。医疗保健专业人员知识不足、疼痛评估不充分、对成瘾的恐惧以及认为疼痛是癌症不可避免的组成部分等观念,都是常见的障碍。关于全面疼痛评估和最佳管理策略的教育,以及关于疼痛信念系统的讨论,有助于弥合痛苦与舒适之间的差距。自我报告是疼痛评估的金标准。收集有关疼痛部位、强度、性质和时间因素的信息至关重要。应使用评分量表对强度进行量化,以确定疼痛程度和干预措施带来的缓解程度。疼痛性质可用于诊断特定的疼痛综合征。时间因素提供了关于疼痛随时间如何被感知的信息,并可为疼痛护理管理计划提供参考。对于无法自我报告疼痛的患者,可使用非语言评估工具来辅助评估。世界卫生组织的镇痛阶梯为癌症疼痛管理提供了一个模板。第一步,可使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和其他非阿片类镇痛药来控制疼痛。随着疼痛持续或加重,第二步涉及使用选定的阿片类药物来管理轻度至中度疼痛,同时联合使用NSAIDs和非阿片类镇痛药。该阶梯的第三步适用于许多癌症疼痛综合征,包括使用阿片类药物治疗中度至重度疼痛,并联合使用NSAIDs和非阿片类药物。这种三步法的有效率可达80% - 90%。这种联合使用行为辅助技术的多药治疗方法,通常用于在转导、传递、感知和调制过程中沿着生理途径阻断疼痛。采用第三步方法仍无法控制的严重癌症疼痛,值得特别关注并采用独特的控制策略。当疼痛控制不足或副作用无法耐受时,建议更换阿片类药物或改变给药途径。对于患有顽固性疼痛或对全身性阿片类药物有无法耐受的副作用的患者,可试用脊髓内镇痛药。这种给药途径对位于躯干水平或以下的神经性疼痛综合征尤其有帮助。所有顽固性疼痛患者的阿片类药物剂量都应谨慎滴定,以在毒性管理与缓解疼痛之间取得平衡,实现最佳缓解效果。对于顽固性疼痛,应研究包括神经阻滞和神经消融在内的其他策略。对患者的总体目标是在副作用最小的情况下实现舒适,并达到最佳生活质量。