Institute of Cell Signalling, C Floor Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Br J Pharmacol. 2010 Jul;160(5):1048-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.00754.x.
There are two important properties of receptor-ligand interactions: affinity (the ability of the ligand to bind to the receptor) and efficacy (the ability of the receptor-ligand complex to induce a response). Ligands are classified as agonists or antagonists depending on whether or not they have efficacy. In theory, it is possible to develop selective agonists based on selective affinity, selective intrinsic efficacy or both. This study examined the affinity and intrinsic efficacy of 31 beta-adrenoceptor agonists at the three human beta-adrenoceptors to determine whether the current agonists are subtype selective because of affinity or intrinsic efficacy.
Stable clonal CHO-K1 cell lines, transfected with either the human beta(1), beta(2) or beta(3)-adrenoceptor, were used, and whole-cell [(3)H]-CGP 12177 radioligand binding and [(3)H]-cAMP accumulation were measured.
Several agonists were found to be highly subtype selective because of selective affinity (e.g. salmeterol and formoterol, for the beta(2)-adrenoceptor over the beta(1) or beta(3)), while others (e.g. isoprenaline) had little affinity-selectivity. However, the intrinsic efficacy of salmeterol, formoterol and isoprenaline was similar across all three receptor subtypes. Other ligands (e.g. denopamine for beta(1); clenbuterol, AZ 40140d, salbutamol for beta(2)) were found to have subtype-selective intrinsic efficacy. Several ligands appeared to activate two agonist conformations of the beta(1)- and beta(3)-adrenoceptors.
There are agonists with subtype selectivity based upon both selective affinity and selective intrinsic efficacy. Therefore, there is scope to develop better selective agonists based upon both selective affinity and selective intrinsic efficacy.
受体-配体相互作用有两个重要特性:亲和力(配体与受体结合的能力)和效力(受体-配体复合物诱导反应的能力)。根据是否具有效力,配体被分类为激动剂或拮抗剂。理论上,可以基于选择性亲和力、选择性内在效力或两者来开发选择性激动剂。本研究检查了 31 种β-肾上腺素受体激动剂在三种人β-肾上腺素受体上的亲和力和内在效力,以确定当前的激动剂是否由于亲和力或内在效力而具有亚型选择性。
使用稳定的 CHO-K1 克隆细胞系,转染人β(1)、β(2)或β(3)-肾上腺素受体,测量全细胞[3H]-CGP 12177 放射性配体结合和[3H]-cAMP 积累。
发现几种激动剂由于选择性亲和力(例如沙美特罗和福莫特罗,对β(2)-肾上腺素受体相对于β(1)或β(3))而具有高度亚型选择性,而其他激动剂(例如异丙肾上腺素)则亲和力选择性低。然而,沙美特罗、福莫特罗和异丙肾上腺素的内在效力在所有三种受体亚型中相似。其他配体(例如,去甲肾上腺素用于β(1);氯丙那林、AZ 40140d、沙丁胺醇用于β(2))被发现具有亚型选择性内在效力。一些配体似乎激活了β(1)-和β(3)-肾上腺素受体的两种激动剂构象。
有一些基于选择性亲和力和选择性内在效力的具有亚型选择性的激动剂。因此,有可能基于选择性亲和力和选择性内在效力来开发更好的选择性激动剂。