Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
BMC Urol. 2010 Jun 30;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-10-12.
There seems to be no consensus concerning taking bladder biopsies during transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TUR-BT). We investigate the clinical significance of bladder biopsy with TUR-BT and the relationship between urinary cytology and the biopsy results.
We reviewed a total of 424 patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer treated with TUR-BT between 1998 and 2005. Of the total, 293 patients also underwent a bladder biopsy. Biopsies from suspicious-appearing urothelium (N = 59) and those from normal-appearing urothelium (N = 234) were evaluated separately.
Bladder cancer was observed in 23 cases (39.0%) who underwent a biopsy of suspicious-appearing urothelium. Among these 23 cases, 9 cases with visible tumor resection had carcinoma in situ (CIS) only in the biopsies from suspicious-appearing urothelium. Urinary cytology was negative in 3 of the 9 cases. Bladder cancer was observed in 26 cases (11.1%) who underwent a biopsy of normal-appearing urothelium. Of them, 5 cases with visible tumors had CIS only in the multiple biopsies from normal-appearing urothelium. Urinary cytology was positive in all of the 5 cases. No upstaging or upgrading cases were found in these patients by the addition of these two types of biopsy. Furthermore, therapy was not altered in these patients. With or without bladder biopsy was not a significant factor for tumor recurrence in either the univariate or multivariate analysis.
Based on the results, it is concluded the multiple biopsies from normal-appearing urothelium are not necessary in patients with negative cytology results because of the low detection rate and lack of influence on therapeutic decisions. Meanwhile, biopsy of suspicious-appearing urothelium is needed in patients with negative cytology results in order to detect CIS due to staging properties. This result supports a recent EAU guideline.
经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术(TUR-BT)时是否进行膀胱活检似乎尚无定论。我们研究了 TUR-BT 时膀胱活检的临床意义及尿细胞学与活检结果的关系。
我们回顾了 1998 年至 2005 年间接受 TUR-BT 治疗的 424 例非肌层浸润性膀胱癌患者的资料。其中 293 例患者还接受了膀胱活检。分别评估可疑外观尿路上皮(N=59)和正常外观尿路上皮(N=234)的活检。
23 例(39.0%)可疑外观尿路上皮活检患者发现膀胱癌。这 23 例中,9 例可见肿瘤切除患者,仅在可疑外观尿路上皮活检中发现原位癌(CIS)。其中 3 例尿细胞学检查阴性。26 例(11.1%)正常外观尿路上皮活检患者发现膀胱癌。其中 5 例可见肿瘤患者,仅在多次正常外观尿路上皮活检中发现 CIS。这 5 例患者的尿细胞学检查均为阳性。这些患者通过增加这两种类型的活检并未发现分期升级或降级。此外,这些患者的治疗方案没有改变。无论是否进行膀胱活检,在单因素或多因素分析中均不是肿瘤复发的显著因素。
根据这些结果,在细胞学检查阴性的患者中,由于检出率低且对治疗决策无影响,多次正常外观尿路上皮活检没有必要。同时,对于细胞学检查阴性的患者,由于具有分期作用,需要对可疑外观尿路上皮进行活检以检测 CIS。该结果支持最近的 EAU 指南。