International Neurotrauma Research Organization, Vienna, Austria , and Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Social Services, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovak Republic.
J Neurotrauma. 2010 Sep;27(9):1549-55. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1315.
The goal of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) who had Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 3 or 4, and were aged 66 years or older. Between January 2001 and December 2005, 13 European centers enrolled patients with severe brain trauma. Data sets of all patients who had a GCS score of 3 or 4 and were 66 years of age or older were analyzed. Outcomes were classified according to the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) 12 months post-trauma as "favorable" (GOS score of 4 or 5), or "unfavorable" (GOS score of 1-3); relevant data for patients of the two groups were compared. Variables were analyzed by univariate analyses (chi-square, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, and Fisher's exact tests), and a p value of <0.05 was considered significant. We analyzed 100 patients identified from the database as having GCS scores of 3 or 4 and age over 65 years. Factors having significant effects on outcomes were worse results of the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) for the head. Closed or partially closed basal cisterns and/or midline shift >15 mm were also associated with unfavorable outcomes, as was subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Patients with GCS scores of 3 or 4 who are older than 65 years have a poor, but not hopeless, prognosis. Confirmed factors predicting poor prognosis for this group of patients were closed basal cisterns and midline shift >15 mm on the first CT scan. Factors possibly related to favorable outcomes were female gender, lower trauma severity, open or partially open basal cisterns, and no midline shift on the first CT scan.
本研究旨在探讨格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分为 3 或 4 分且年龄在 66 岁及以上的创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者的预后。2001 年 1 月至 2005 年 12 月,13 个欧洲中心招募了严重颅脑创伤患者。分析了所有 GCS 评分为 3 或 4 分且年龄在 66 岁及以上的患者的数据组。根据创伤后 12 个月的格拉斯哥结局量表(GOS)将预后分为“良好”(GOS 评分为 4 或 5)或“不良”(GOS 评分为 1-3);比较了两组患者的相关数据。采用单变量分析(卡方检验、Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney 检验和 Fisher 确切检验)分析变量,p 值<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。我们从数据库中分析了 100 例 GCS 评分为 3 或 4 分且年龄超过 65 岁的患者。对结果有显著影响的因素是损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、创伤和损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)和头部简明损伤评分(AIS)的结果较差。闭合或部分闭合的基底池和/或中线移位>15mm 以及蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)也与不良预后相关。GCS 评分为 3 或 4 分且年龄超过 65 岁的患者预后较差,但并非没有希望。证实了这组患者预后不良的预测因素是首次 CT 扫描时闭合的基底池和>15mm 的中线移位。可能与良好结局相关的因素是女性、较低的创伤严重程度、开放或部分开放的基底池以及首次 CT 扫描时无中线移位。