Suppr超能文献

二维特征跟踪成像超声心动图半自动定量左心室功能。与心脏磁共振成像的比较研究。

Semiautomatic quantification of left ventricular function by two-dimensional feature tracking imaging echocardiography. A comparison study with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Di Bella Gianluca, Zito Concetta, Gaeta Michele, Cusmà Piccione Maurizio, Minutoli Fabio, Donato Rocco, Recupero Antonino, Madaffari Antonio, Coglitore Sebastiano, Carerj Scipione

机构信息

Clinical and Experimental Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

Echocardiography. 2010 Aug;27(7):791-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.01136.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of a semiautomatic quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using two-dimensional (2D) feature tracking imaging (FTI).

METHODS

Thirty-four consecutive subjects (11 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, 13 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and 10 subjects with no cardiac disease) underwent, on the same day, trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) examination, FTI, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as gold standard, in order to quantify LV volumes and EF. The echocardiographic quantification of LV volumes and EF was determined from four- and two-chamber views using both standard TTE Biplane Simpson's method and a semiautomatic border detection based on FTI. Furthermore, the time for data analysis for each method was measured.

RESULTS

The time required for semiautomatic analysis of volumes and EF was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) by FTI (71 seconds) in comparison with standard biplane Simpson's method (93 seconds). LV volumes obtained by FTI were significant underestimated (P < 0.001) in comparison with MRI. Bland-Altman analysis of EDV and ESV using FTI and cardiac MRI showed a low level of agreement for EDV (mean difference = 40.8; SD = 39) and ESV (mean difference = 38.1; SD = 42). On the contrary, no significant difference between FTI and MRI in assessing the LVEF was found; furthermore, a very low bias (2 ± 12) by Bland-Altman analysis was found between FTI and cardiac MRI for the quantification of EF.

CONCLUSION

Semiautomatic quantification of LV volumes using FTI allows an accurate, rapid, easy and reliable assessment of LV EF and a rough estimation of LV volumes.

摘要

目的

使用二维(2D)特征跟踪成像(FTI)评估半自动定量左心室(LV)容积和射血分数(EF)的准确性。

方法

34名连续受试者(11例扩张型心肌病患者、13例肥厚型心肌病患者和10名无心脏病受试者)在同一天接受经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查、FTI检查以及作为金标准的心脏磁共振成像(MRI)检查,以定量LV容积和EF。使用标准TTE双平面Simpson法和基于FTI的半自动边界检测,从四腔心和两腔心视图确定LV容积和EF的超声心动图定量。此外,测量了每种方法的数据分析时间。

结果

与标准双平面Simpson法(93秒)相比,FTI半自动分析容积和EF所需时间显著更短(P < 0.0001)(71秒)。与MRI相比,FTI获得的LV容积显著低估(P < 0.001)。使用FTI和心脏MRI对舒张末期容积(EDV)和收缩末期容积(ESV)进行Bland-Altman分析显示,EDV(平均差异 = 40.8;标准差 = 39)和ESV(平均差异 = 38.1;标准差 = 42)的一致性水平较低。相反,在评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)方面,FTI和MRI之间未发现显著差异;此外,在EF定量方面,FTI和心脏MRI之间通过Bland-Altman分析发现偏差非常低(2 ± 12)。

结论

使用FTI半自动定量LV容积可对LV EF进行准确、快速、简便且可靠的评估,并对LV容积进行粗略估计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验