Berding Georg, Geisler Siegfried, Melter Michael, Marquardt Patricia, Lühr Astrid, Scheller Friedemann, Knoop Bernd O, Pfister Eva-Doreen, Pape Lars, Bischoff Lutz, Knapp Wolfram H, Ehrich Jochen H H
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Sep 1;14(6):786-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01342.x. Epub 2010 Jun 27.
This study evaluated simple procedures for GFR determination in 48 liver-transplanted children. After injection of (51)Cr-EDTA, blood samples were obtained up to four h, and activity retention in the body was measured for 60 min with scintillation probes. As a reference, GFR was calculated according to Sapirstein. Simplified calculations were performed according to Brochner-Mortensen, Russel, Devaux and Oberhausen. Additionally, GFR was determined using plasma creatinine and cystatin C according to Schwartz and Filler, respectively. The reference revealed mildly reduced GFR (62 +/- 20 mL/min/1.73 m(2)). Russel's method provided the highest degree of correlation (r(2) = 0.95), the smallest bias in GFR determination (-2%), and only one false exclusion plus one false diagnosis of chronic kidney disease. Oberhausen's method with blood sampling at one h post-injection performed slightly worse (r(2) = 0.67, bias: 3%). All other methods resulted in significantly different GFR estimates compared to the reference. Nevertheless, notably, the second narrowest 95% limits of agreement (-31% to 45%) was observed using cystatin C. In conclusion, this data implies to prefer Russel's method as a simplified procedure, and if patients cannot be available long enough (four h) for measurements, Oberhausen's method instead. If radiotracer methods are not available at all or for screening GFR, cystatin C appears to be the procedure of choice.
本研究评估了48例肝移植儿童中测定肾小球滤过率(GFR)的简单方法。注射(51)铬-乙二胺四乙酸后,在长达4小时内采集血样,并用闪烁探头测量体内的放射性活度保留60分钟。作为参考,根据萨皮尔斯坦法计算GFR。根据布罗chner-莫滕森、拉塞尔、德沃和奥伯豪森法进行简化计算。此外,分别根据施瓦茨法和菲勒法,使用血浆肌酐和胱抑素C测定GFR。参考结果显示GFR轻度降低(62±20毫升/分钟/1.73平方米)。拉塞尔法具有最高的相关性(r² = 0.95),在GFR测定中偏差最小(-2%),且仅有1例假排除和1例假诊断为慢性肾脏病。注射后1小时采血的奥伯豪森法表现稍差(r² = 0.67,偏差:3%)。与参考值相比,所有其他方法得出的GFR估计值均有显著差异。然而,值得注意的是,使用胱抑素C观察到的95%一致性界限第二窄(-31%至45%)。总之,这些数据表明,作为一种简化方法,更倾向于使用拉塞尔法;如果患者无法长时间(4小时)进行测量,则可使用奥伯豪森法。如果完全没有放射性示踪剂方法或用于筛查GFR,胱抑素C似乎是首选方法。