Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 17;56(8):646-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.058. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
This study was undertaken to determine the safety and feasibility of extraction of the Sprint Fidelis (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) lead.
The reported failure rate of the Sprint Fidelis defibrillator lead has increased to a range greater than initially appreciated with emerging evidence of an accelerating rate of fracture. At present, consensus guidelines continue to recommend against prophylactic extraction of the lead, citing major complication rates between 1.4% and 7.3%. However, data regarding the safety and feasibility of extraction of small-diameter, backfilled implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads such as the Sprint Fidelis are limited.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing extraction of Sprint Fidelis (models 6930, 6931, 6948, 6949) leads at 5 high-volume centers. Patient characteristics, indications for extraction, and use of countertraction sheath (CTS) assistance are reported. The risk of major and minor complications was determined. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed to predict factors associated with the use of CTS assistance.
Between May 2005 and August 2009, 349 Sprint Fidelis leads were extracted from 348 patients. All leads were removed completely. The average duration of the implanted lead was 27.5 months (range 0.03 to 58.8 months). Approximately one-half of the extracted leads were fractured (49.4%), and 26.5% were extracted prophylactically. The other major indication for extraction was infection (22.8%). Extraction was achieved with simple traction in 49.4% leads; CTS assistance was required in 174 cases (50.6%). In multivariable models, length of time since implantation was directly related to the need for CTS assistance (odds ratio per month since implantation: 1.035; 95% confidence interval: 1.010 to 1.061; p=0.006). There were no major procedural complications or deaths.
Extraction of the Sprint Fidelis lead can be performed safely by experienced operators at high-volume centers with a complication rate lower than that reported for older generation leads. However, leads with longer implant durations are associated with the use of CTS assistance. Recommendations regarding prophylactic Sprint Fidelis lead extraction may warrant reconsideration.
本研究旨在确定提取 Sprint Fidelis(美敦力,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯)导线的安全性和可行性。
Sprint Fidelis 除颤器导线的报告故障率已增至最初预期范围以上,并有加速断裂的证据。目前,共识指南继续建议不要预防性提取导线,主要并发症发生率在 1.4%至 7.3%之间。然而,有关提取 Sprint Fidelis 等小直径、回填式植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的安全性和可行性的数据有限。
我们在 5 个高容量中心进行了连续接受 Sprint Fidelis(型号 6930、6931、6948、6949)导线提取的患者的回顾性队列研究。报告了患者特征、提取指征和使用反向牵引鞘(CTS)辅助的情况。确定了主要和次要并发症的风险。建立了多变量逻辑回归模型来预测与 CTS 辅助使用相关的因素。
2005 年 5 月至 2009 年 8 月,从 348 名患者中取出 349 根 Sprint Fidelis 导线。所有导线均完全取出。植入导线的平均时间为 27.5 个月(范围 0.03 至 58.8 个月)。约一半的提取导线断裂(49.4%),26.5%预防性提取。提取的另一个主要指征是感染(22.8%)。49.4%的导线采用单纯牵引法取出,174 例(50.6%)需要 CTS 辅助。在多变量模型中,植入后时间与 CTS 辅助的需求直接相关(每植入后一个月的比值比:1.035;95%置信区间:1.010 至 1.061;p=0.006)。没有主要的程序并发症或死亡。
在高容量中心,经验丰富的操作人员可以安全地进行 Sprint Fidelis 导线的提取,并发症发生率低于旧一代导线。然而,植入时间较长的导线与 CTS 辅助的使用相关。关于预防性 Sprint Fidelis 导线提取的建议可能需要重新考虑。