Brown University, Butler Hospital, General Medicine Research, Providence, RI 02906, USA.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Sep;39(2):157-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
Our goal was to determine whether treatment of depressive symptoms with escitalopram during buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence would improve treatment retention compared to placebo in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial. Treatment dropout was defined as missing seven consecutive buprenorphine dosing days. Participants were 76% male, 80% non-Hispanic Caucasian, and 64% heroin users. At baseline, the mean Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score was 28.4 (+/-9.7). Sixty-one percent of participants completed the 12-week buprenorphine protocol. Dropout rates were 33.3% and 44.0% among those randomized to escitalopram or placebo, respectively (p = .19). Relative to baseline, mean BDI-II scores were significantly lower at all follow-up assessments, but the Treatment x Time interaction effect was not statistically significant (p = .18). Participants randomized to escitalopram also did not have a significantly lower likelihood of testing positive for either opiates or other drugs during follow-up. Depressive symptoms often resolved with buprenorphine treatment, and the immediate initiation of escitalopram does not improve treatment retention, depression outcomes, or illicit drug use. Clinicians should determine the need for antidepressant treatment later in buprenorphine care.
我们的目标是确定在阿片类药物依赖的丁丙诺啡治疗中,用艾司西酞普兰治疗抑郁症状是否会比安慰剂在 12 周的随机、双盲试验中提高治疗保留率。治疗脱落被定义为连续错过七天丁丙诺啡剂量日。参与者中 76%为男性,80%为非西班牙裔白种人,64%为海洛因使用者。在基线时,贝克抑郁量表二(BDI-II)的平均得分为 28.4(+/-9.7)。61%的参与者完成了 12 周的丁丙诺啡方案。随机分配到艾司西酞普兰或安慰剂组的脱落率分别为 33.3%和 44.0%(p =.19)。与基线相比,所有随访评估的平均 BDI-II 评分均显著降低,但治疗与时间的交互作用效应无统计学意义(p =.18)。随机分配到艾司西酞普兰组的参与者在随访期间检测到阿片类药物或其他药物阳性的可能性也没有显著降低。抑郁症状常随丁丙诺啡治疗而缓解,立即开始使用艾司西酞普兰并不能提高治疗保留率、抑郁结局或非法药物使用。临床医生应在丁丙诺啡治疗后确定是否需要抗抑郁治疗。