School of Physiotherapy and Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Australia University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Australia Monash Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Cabrini Hospital, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia School of Exercise, Biomedical, and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Australia Deakin Population Health Strategic Research Centre, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Australia.
Pain. 2010 Aug;150(2):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.04.031.
Health literacy, the ability to seek, understand and utilise health information, is important for good health. Suboptimal health literacy has been associated with poorer health outcomes in many chronic conditions although this has not been studied in chronic low back pain (CLBP). We examined the health literacy of individuals with CLBP using a mixed methods approach. One-hundred and seventeen adults, comprising 61 with no history of CLBP and 56 with CLBP (28 with low and high disability, respectively, as determined by a median split in Oswestry scores) participated. Data regarding severity of pain, LBP-related disability, fear avoidance, beliefs about LBP and pain catastrophizing were collected using questionnaires. Health literacy was measured using the Short-form Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (S-TOFHLA). A sub-sample of 36 participants with CLBP also participated in in-depth interviews to qualitatively explore their beliefs about LBP and experiences in seeking, understanding and using information related to LBP. LBP-related beliefs and behaviours, rather than pain intensity and health literacy skills, were found to be important correlates of disability related to LBP. Individuals with CLBP-high disability had poorer back pain beliefs and increased fear avoidance behaviours relating to physical activity. Health literacy (S-TOFHLA) was not related to LBP beliefs and attitudes. Qualitatively, individuals with CLBP-high disability adopted a more passive coping style and had a pathoanatomic view of their disorder compared to individuals with CLBP-low disability. While all participants with CLBP had adequate health literacy scores (S-TOFHLA), qualitative data highlighted difficulties in seeking, understanding and utilising LBP information.
健康素养,即寻求、理解和利用健康信息的能力,对健康至关重要。尽管在慢性腰痛(CLBP)中尚未对此进行研究,但在许多慢性疾病中,健康素养欠佳与较差的健康结果相关。我们采用混合方法研究了 CLBP 患者的健康素养。117 名成年人参与了此项研究,其中 61 名无 CLBP 病史,56 名患有 CLBP(根据 Oswestry 评分中位数分为 28 名低残疾和高残疾)。使用问卷收集有关疼痛严重程度、与腰痛相关的残疾、恐惧回避、对腰痛的信念和疼痛灾难化的信息。使用成人简易健康素养测试(S-TOFHLA)来测量健康素养。CLBP 患者中有 36 名参与者参加了深入访谈,以定性探索他们对腰痛的信念以及在寻求、理解和使用与腰痛相关信息方面的经验。与腰痛相关的信念和行为,而不是疼痛强度和健康素养技能,与腰痛相关的残疾有关。高残疾的 CLBP 患者对背部疼痛的信念较差,并且对与身体活动相关的恐惧回避行为增加。健康素养(S-TOFHLA)与腰痛信念和态度无关。从定性的角度来看,高残疾的 CLBP 患者比低残疾的 CLBP 患者采取了更被动的应对方式,对自己的疾病有病理解剖学的看法。虽然所有 CLBP 患者的健康素养评分(S-TOFHLA)均合格,但定性数据突出了在寻求、理解和利用腰痛信息方面存在的困难。