Kłosiewicz-Latoszek L, Szostak W B
National Food and Nutrition Institute, Department of Clinical Nutrition, Warsaw, Poland.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1991;40(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/BF00315136.
Two trials have been performed in the same patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types IIb (12 cases), III (6 cases) and IV (11 cases). In the first study the lipid-lowering properties of bezafibrate, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate were compared and in a separate trial the influence of combined treatment with gemfibrozil plus colestipol and bezafibrate plus probucol on lipoproteins were investigated. The mean percentage lipid-lowering effect of each fibrate on serum and VLDL fraction was significant in the Types IIb, III and IV patients, but there were significant differences between the fibrates. In general, gemfibrozil and bezafibrate decreased plasma lipid levels more than etofibrate and etofylline clofibrate in Type IIb patients. In Type IV cases gemfibrozil and bezafibrate were significantly potent in reducing the triglyceride level than fenofibrate, etofibrate or etofylline clofibrate. All the fibrates produced an increase in HDL cholesterol, but there were significant differences between them were in the Type IV patients. The influence of fibrates on the LDL fraction was much more variable. In hyperlipoproteinaemia Type IIb, a decrease in both LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B was observed. In Type III and IV patients, however, an increase in LDL concentration occurred. The addition of colestipol to gemfibrozil therapy led to a further decrease in total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and LDL apolipoprotein B in Type IIb patients. In patients with hyperlipoproteinaemia Types III and IV colestipol prevented the increase in LDL concentration after treatment with gemfibrozil alone. The effect of probucol on LDL cholesterol was comparable to that of colestipol. Combined treatment with gemfibrozil and colestipol caused an increase in HDL cholesterol concentration in contrast to combined treatment with bezafibrate and probucol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对患有IIb型(12例)、III型(6例)和IV型(11例)高脂蛋白血症的同一批患者进行了两项试验。在第一项研究中,比较了苯扎贝特、非诺贝特、吉非贝齐、益多酯和氯贝茶碱的降脂特性,在另一项试验中,研究了吉非贝齐加考来替泊以及苯扎贝特加普罗布考联合治疗对脂蛋白的影响。每种贝特类药物对血清和极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL)部分的平均降脂百分比在IIb型、III型和IV型患者中均有显著意义,但贝特类药物之间存在显著差异。总体而言,在IIb型患者中,吉非贝齐和苯扎贝特降低血浆脂质水平的作用大于益多酯和氯贝茶碱。在IV型病例中,吉非贝齐和苯扎贝特降低甘油三酯水平的效力明显高于非诺贝特、益多酯或氯贝茶碱。所有贝特类药物均使高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇升高,但在IV型患者中它们之间存在显著差异。贝特类药物对低密度脂蛋白(LDL)部分的影响变化更大。在IIb型高脂蛋白血症中,观察到LDL胆固醇和LDL载脂蛋白B均降低。然而,在III型和IV型患者中,LDL浓度升高。在IIb型患者中,在吉非贝齐治疗中加用考来替泊导致总胆固醇、LDL胆固醇和LDL载脂蛋白B进一步降低。在III型和IV型高脂蛋白血症患者中,考来替泊可防止单独使用吉非贝齐治疗后LDL浓度升高。普罗布考对LDL胆固醇的作用与考来替泊相当。与苯扎贝特和普罗布考联合治疗相比,吉非贝齐和考来替泊联合治疗导致HDL胆固醇浓度升高。(摘要截选至250词)