School of Biology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jul 20;107(29):12925-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000699107. Epub 2010 Jul 2.
Ecologists have long recognized the roles of competition and disturbance in shaping ecological communities, and the combinatorial effects of these two factors have been the subject of substantial ecological research. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether competition remains as an important structuring force in habitats strongly influenced by disturbance. The conventional belief remains that the importance of competition decreases with increasing disturbance, but limited theory suggests otherwise. Using protist communities established in laboratory microcosms, we demonstrate that disturbance does not diminish the importance of competition. Interspecific competition significantly increased rates of species extinction over a broad disturbance gradient, and increasing disturbance intensities increased, rather than decreased, the tempo of competitive exclusion. This community-level pattern is linked to the species-level pattern that interspecific competition led to most frequent extinctions of each species at the highest level of disturbance that the species can tolerate. Consequently, despite a strong tradeoff between competitive ability and disturbance tolerance across the competing species, species diversity generally declined with disturbance. The consistent structuring role of competition throughout the disturbance gradient underscores the need to understand competitive interactions and their consequences even in highly disturbed habitats.
生态学家早就认识到竞争和干扰在塑造生态群落中的作用,这两个因素的组合效应一直是大量生态学研究的主题。然而,在强烈受干扰的栖息地中,竞争是否仍然是一种重要的结构力量,这一点仍不清楚。传统观点认为,竞争的重要性随着干扰的增加而降低,但有限的理论表明并非如此。本研究利用实验室微宇宙中建立的原生动物群落,证明干扰并不会降低竞争的重要性。种间竞争显著增加了物种灭绝的速度,在广泛的干扰梯度上,而且随着干扰强度的增加,竞争排斥的速度也在增加,而不是降低。这种群落水平的模式与种间竞争导致每个物种在其所能耐受的最高干扰水平下最频繁灭绝的种水平模式相联系。因此,尽管在竞争物种之间存在竞争能力和干扰耐受能力之间的强烈权衡,但物种多样性通常随着干扰而下降。竞争在整个干扰梯度上的一致结构作用强调了即使在高度受干扰的栖息地中,也需要了解竞争相互作用及其后果。