Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, UK.
Int J Surg. 2010;8(6):426-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.016. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
Appendicectomy is one of the commoner operations with a lifetime risk as high as 12% or 23% in males or females, respectively. Since the 1940s intra-operative intra-peritoneal swabs have commonly been taken from the appendix site, the spectrum of infecting organisms and their antibiotic sensitivity may be gauged from the culture results. This approach remains common but in recent years, studies have claimed that intra-peritoneal swabs are unnecessary; however, they relied upon retrospective patient groups predating wider use of laparoscopic appendicectomy, increasing numbers of immunocompromised people at risk of appendicitis and the clinical/medicolegal significance of increasing risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridium difficile colitis. Therefore, a key-word literature research was done to identify relevant publications from 1930 to June 2009. Newer features relating to intra-peritoneal swabs in appendicectomy have been discussed against this background information for periabdominal appendicectomy with or without appendicular perforation, laparoscopic appendicectomy and appendicectomy in the growing numbers of immunocompromised patients. All studies questioning the use of intra-peritoneal swabs were open, non-randomised, and retrospective with incompletely matched control groups, non-standardised swab collection techniques, and consequently lacked power to inform surgical practice. They concluded that an appropriately powered randomised, blinded, prospective, controlled clinical trial is needed to test for absolute efficacy in the use of peritoneal swabs in patient management. Until controlled trial data becomes available, it may be wise to continue peritoneal swabs at least in high-risk patients to decrease clinical and medicolegal risk.
阑尾切除术是一种常见的手术,男性终生风险高达 12%,女性则为 23%。自 20 世纪 40 年代以来,术中腹腔内拭子通常从阑尾部位采集,通过培养结果可以评估感染病原体及其抗生素敏感性。这种方法仍然很常见,但近年来,一些研究声称腹腔内拭子是不必要的;然而,这些研究依赖于回顾性的患者群体,这些患者群体在腹腔镜阑尾切除术广泛应用之前,免疫功能低下的人群因阑尾炎而面临的风险增加,以及抗生素相关性艰难梭菌结肠炎的风险增加的临床/法医学意义。因此,进行了关键词文献研究,以确定从 1930 年到 2009 年 6 月的相关出版物。在这种背景下,讨论了与腹腔内拭子相关的阑尾切除术的新特征,包括有或没有阑尾穿孔的腹腔周围阑尾切除术、腹腔镜阑尾切除术和免疫功能低下患者数量不断增加的阑尾切除术。所有质疑腹腔内拭子使用的研究都是开放性的、非随机的、回顾性的,对照组合并不完全匹配,拭子采集技术不标准,因此缺乏告知手术实践的能力。他们得出结论,需要进行一项适当的、随机的、盲法的、前瞻性的、对照的临床试验,以检验在患者管理中使用腹腔拭子的绝对疗效。在对照试验数据可用之前,至少在高危患者中继续使用腹腔拭子可能是明智的,以降低临床和法医学风险。