Suppr超能文献

治疗牙龈退缩后根覆盖美学评分:一项评价者间一致性的多中心研究。

Root coverage esthetic score after treatment of gingival recession: an interrater agreement multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2010 Dec;81(12):1752-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100278. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The root coverage esthetic score (RES) system was proposed for evaluating esthetic outcomes of root coverage procedures. The aim of this multicenter study is to assess the interrater agreement of the RES among expert periodontists.

METHODS

Eleven periodontists were selected in different clinical centers. Each operator had ≥15 years of experience in mucogingival surgery. Each periodontist was trained to use RES before the beginning of the study. Subsequently, baseline and post-treatment (6 months) photographs of 41 Class I and II gingival recessions in 41 patients were separately given to each operator who evaluated the outcomes according to the RES method. A two-way random interclass correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the global interrater agreement for RESs.

RESULTS

The total interrater agreement for RESs was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88 to 0.95), which indicated that an almost perfect agreement was achieved.

CONCLUSION

Tested individually by a group of periodontists, the RES seems to be a reliable method for assessing the esthetic outcomes of root coverage procedures.

摘要

背景

根覆盖美学评分(RES)系统是为评估根覆盖手术的美学效果而提出的。本多中心研究的目的是评估专家牙周医生之间 RES 的评分者间一致性。

方法

在不同的临床中心选择了 11 名牙周医生。每位医生都有≥15 年的黏骨膜手术经验。在研究开始前,每位牙周医生都接受了 RES 的培训。然后,将 41 名患者的 41 处 I 类和 II 类牙龈退缩的基线和治疗后(6 个月)照片分别提供给每位医生,他们根据 RES 方法评估结果。使用双向随机组内相关系数和 95%置信区间(CI)来评估 RES 的总体评分者间一致性。

结果

RES 的总评分者间一致性为 0.92(95%CI:0.88 至 0.95),这表明达成了几乎完美的一致性。

结论

由一组牙周医生单独测试,RES 似乎是评估根覆盖手术美学效果的可靠方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验