Suppr超能文献

探索在营养实习期间的以学习为评估。

Exploring assessment for learning during dietetic practice placements.

机构信息

School of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

J Hum Nutr Diet. 2010 Jun;23(3):217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01075.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Practice placement, which contributes to the development of professional skills and competencies, is an important component of dietetic pre-registration education in the UK. The assessment of practice placement impacts on students' experience and progression; however, currently, limited evidence-based information about assessment methods and practice in dietetic placements exists. The present study aimed to investigate the assessment methods and practices utilised when providing pre-registration dietetic practice placements.

METHOD

Using an online questionnaire survey of dietitians within Scottish National Health Service (NHS) dietetic departments, and a follow-on telephone interview with Lead Trainers, the present study explored the assessment methods utilised by dietitians as well as areas of variability within NHS Boards. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and relationships were assessed using the chi-square test, Kruskall-Wallis test and Spearmans' correlation.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven fully-completed questionnaires were analysed and fourteen departments participated in the follow-on telephone interview. Over 80% respondents had greater than 2 years of involvement in student training. To assess student performance, departments used between 5-16 and 6-16 assessment tools for placements B and C, respectively. Significant correlations between staff training and knowledge of how to apply assessment tools support a need for robust staff training in assessment matters. The majority (87%) of respondents positively favour standardisation of assessment via the development of national assessment tools.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings obtained in the present study confirm that there is a wide variation in assessment practices by dietitians. The development of standardised assessments and tools within dietetic practice placements, in terms of parity in numbers and methods of assessment, would ensure equity and fairness for students.

摘要

背景

实践安排是英国营养学预注册教育的重要组成部分,有助于专业技能和能力的发展。实践安排的评估会影响学生的体验和进步;然而,目前关于评估方法和实践的循证信息有限。本研究旨在调查提供预注册营养师实践安排时使用的评估方法和实践。

方法

通过对苏格兰国民保健署(NHS)营养师的在线问卷调查,以及对培训负责人的后续电话访谈,本研究探讨了营养师使用的评估方法以及 NHS 董事会内部的差异。使用描述性统计数据分析数据,并使用卡方检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验和斯皮尔曼相关分析评估关系。

结果

分析了 111 份完整的问卷,有 14 个部门参加了后续电话访谈。超过 80%的受访者有超过 2 年的学生培训经验。为了评估学生的表现,各部门分别使用了 5-16 种和 6-16 种评估工具来评估 B 和 C 实习。员工培训与应用评估工具知识之间的显著相关性支持在评估事项方面进行强有力的员工培训。大多数(87%)受访者赞成通过制定国家评估工具来标准化评估。

结论

本研究的结果证实,营养师的评估实践存在很大差异。在营养师实践安排中,制定标准化的评估和工具,在评估数量和方法方面保持一致,将确保学生的公平性和公正性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验