UMR INSERM U558, Research Unit on Perinatal Epidemiology, Child Health and Development, University Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Oct;52(10):e236-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03731.x. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
although inclusive education of disabled children is now an accepted practice, it is often challenged by negative peer attitudes. We undertook an interventional study aimed at improving students' attitudes towards their disabled peers.
the participants were students from the 7th grade of twelve paired schools (1509 students from 62 classes; age 12-13y), randomly allocated to an intervention group (205 males, 285 females) or a control group (132 males, 165 females). The intervention consisted of a mandatory comprehensive educational project on disability. The Chedoke-McMaster Attitudes Towards Children with Handicaps Scale (CATCH) was used to assess children's attitudes before (T0) and after (T1) intervention. The hierarchical structure of the data was taken into account by adjusting standard deviations and using linear multilevel models.
seven hundred and eighty-four students had at least one score on the three domains (cognitive, affective, behavioural) of the CATCH at T0 and T1. The final scores were higher than baseline scores (total scores, intervention group: baseline score 25.6 (SD=5.4), final score 26.8 (5.9), p<0.001;
baseline 25.2 (5.4), final 26.0 (5.7), p<0.009) with no significant difference between the intervention and control groups. Individual score changes over time were associated with baseline score (p<0.001 for total and all sub-scores). Lower improvement in attitudes was found in students from schools with special units for their peers with cognitive impairment for total (p=0.013), affective (p<0.001), and behavioural (p=0.001) scores, while higher improvement existed for the cognitive domain (p=0.029).
although we found no effect of our intervention, we found an improvement in attitudes in the intervention and control groups that could be a result of the nature of the scales and questionnaires the students had to complete before the intervention.
尽管残疾儿童的融合教育现在已被普遍接受,但它常常受到负面同伴态度的挑战。我们进行了一项干预研究,旨在改善学生对残疾同伴的态度。
参与者是来自 12 对配对学校 7 年级的学生(1509 名学生,62 个班级;年龄 12-13 岁),随机分为干预组(205 名男生,285 名女生)或对照组(132 名男生,165 名女生)。干预措施包括一项关于残疾问题的强制性综合教育项目。使用 Chedoke-McMaster 残疾儿童态度量表(CATCH)在干预前(T0)和干预后(T1)评估儿童的态度。考虑到数据的层次结构,通过调整标准差和使用线性多层模型来评估数据。
784 名学生在 T0 和 T1 时至少有 3 个 CATCH 领域(认知、情感、行为)的得分。最终得分高于基线得分(总分,干预组:基线得分 25.6(5.4),最终得分 26.8(5.9),p<0.001;对照组:基线得分 25.2(5.4),最终得分 26.0(5.7),p<0.009),干预组与对照组之间无显著差异。个体随时间的得分变化与基线得分相关(总分和所有子得分均为 p<0.001)。在同伴认知障碍特殊单元的学校中,学生的态度改善程度较低,总得分(p=0.013)、情感得分(p<0.001)和行为得分(p=0.001),而认知领域的改善程度较高(p=0.029)。
尽管我们没有发现我们的干预措施有效果,但我们发现干预组和对照组的态度都有所改善,这可能是由于学生在干预前必须完成的量表和问卷的性质所致。