Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R136. doi: 10.1186/cc9192. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
There are only limited data on the long-term outcome of patients receiving specialized neurocritical care. In this study we analyzed survival, long-term mortality and functional outcome after neurocritical care and determined predictors for good functional outcome.
We retrospectively investigated 796 consecutive patients admitted to a non-surgical neurologic intensive care unit over a period of two years (2006 and 2007). Demographic and clinical parameters were analyzed. Depending on the diagnosis, we grouped patients according to their diseases (cerebral ischemia, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), meningitis/encephalitis, epilepsy, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and myasthenia gravis (MG), neurodegenerative diseases and encephalopathy, cerebral neoplasm and intoxication). Clinical parameters, mortality and functional outcome of all treated patients were analyzed. Functional outcome (using the modified Rankin Scale, mRS) one year after discharge was assessed by a mailed questionnaire or telephone interview. Outcome was dichotomized into good (mRS ≤ 2) and poor (mRS ≥ 3). Logistic regression analyses were calculated to determine independent predictors for good functional outcome.
Overall in-hospital mortality amounted to 22.5% of all patients, and a good long-term functional outcome was achieved in 28.4%. The parameters age, length of ventilation (LOV), admission diagnosis of ICH, GBS/MG, and inoperable cerebral neoplasm as well as Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS)-28 on Day 1 were independently associated with functional outcome after one year.
This investigation revealed that age, LOV and TISS-28 on Day 1 were strongly predictive for the outcome. The diagnoses of hemorrhagic stroke and cerebral neoplasm leading to neurocritical care predispose for functional dependence or death, whereas patients with GBS and MG are more likely to recover after neurocritical care.
目前仅有少量数据可以评估接受神经重症监护的患者的长期预后。本研究分析了神经重症监护后的生存率、长期死亡率和功能预后,并确定了良好功能预后的预测因素。
我们回顾性调查了在两年内(2006 年和 2007 年)入住非手术性神经重症监护病房的 796 例连续患者。分析了人口统计学和临床参数。根据诊断,我们将患者按疾病分组(脑缺血、颅内出血(ICH)、蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)、脑膜炎/脑炎、癫痫、吉兰-巴雷综合征(GBS)和重症肌无力(MG)、神经退行性疾病和脑病、脑肿瘤和中毒)。分析了所有治疗患者的临床参数、死亡率和功能预后。通过邮寄问卷或电话访谈评估出院后 1 年的功能预后(采用改良 Rankin 量表,mRS)。预后分为良好(mRS≤2)和不良(mRS≥3)。计算逻辑回归分析以确定良好功能预后的独立预测因素。
所有患者的住院死亡率为 22.5%,长期预后良好的比例为 28.4%。年龄、通气时间(LOV)、ICH 入院诊断、GBS/MG、无法手术的脑肿瘤以及第 1 天的治疗干预评分系统(TISS)-28 是影响 1 年后功能预后的独立因素。
本研究表明,年龄、LOV 和第 1 天的 TISS-28 是预后的强预测因素。导致神经重症监护的出血性中风和脑肿瘤诊断预示着功能依赖或死亡,而 GBS 和 MG 患者在神经重症监护后更有可能恢复。