新时代的透明度下的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
机构信息
Collegeville, Pennsylvania, USA.
出版信息
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Aug;88(2):155-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.124.
PMID:20648031
Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are useful in integrating large amounts of data to inform medical practice, and it is likely that the already large number of published meta-analyses will increase further as the provisions in the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act and other forces result in dramatically increased transparency about the design and results of clinical trials. It is critical for readers of these analyses to be capable of assessing the quality of this research.
摘要
系统评价和荟萃分析有助于整合大量数据，为医疗实践提供信息，而且随着《食品和药物管理局修正案》和其他因素的规定导致临床试验的设计和结果更加透明，已经大量发表的荟萃分析数量可能会进一步增加。对于这些分析的读者来说，能够评估这项研究的质量至关重要。
相似文献
1
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the new age of transparency.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Aug;88(2):155-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2010.124.
2
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
3
The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):589-94. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000253394.15628.FD.
4
Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug(413):43-54. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000079322.41006.5b.
5
Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):280-8. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.658. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
6
How to use a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.046. Epub 2008 Aug 15.
7
[Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2004 Nov-Dec;62(6):611-27.
8
How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x.
9
Meta-analyses of small numbers of trials often agree with longer-term results.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;64(2):145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.017. Epub 2010 Jul 6.
10
Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;59(12):1249-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
引用本文的文献
1
Deficiencies in the transfer and availability of clinical trials evidence: a review of existing systems and standards.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 4;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-95.
Zotero 插件