Comprehensive Pain and Rehabilitation, Pascagoula, MS 39581, USA.
Pain Physician. 2010 Jul-Aug;13(4):321-35.
With advances in spinal cord stimulation (SCS) technology, particularly rechargeable implantable, patients are now being offered a wider range of parameters to treat their pain. In particular, pulse width (PW) programming ranges of rechargeable implantable pulse generators now match that of radiofrequency systems (with programmability up to 1000 microseconds. The intent of the present study was to investigate the effects of varying PW in SCS.
To understand the effects of PW programming in spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
Single-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind evaluation of the technical and clinical outcomes of PW programming.
Acute, outpatient follow-up.
Subjects using fully-implanted SCS for > 3 months to treat chronic intractable low back and/or leg pain. Programming of a wide range (50-1000 microseconds) of programmed PW settings using each patient's otherwise unchanged 'walk-in' program.
Paresthesia thresholds (perception, maximum comfortable, discomfort), paresthesia coverage and patient choice of tested programs.
We found strength-duration parameters of chronaxie and rheobase to be 295 (242 - 326) microseconds and 2.5 (1.3 - 3.3) mA, respectively. The median PW of all patients' 'walk-out' programs was 400 microseconds, approximately 48% higher than median chronaxie (p = 0.01), suggesting that chronaxie may not relate to patient-preferred stimulation settings. We found that 7/19 patients selected new PW programs, which significantly increased their paresthesia-pain overlap by 56% on average (p = 0.047). We estimated that 10/19 patients appeared to have greater paresthesia coverage, and 8/19 patients appeared to display a 'caudal shift' of paresthesia coverage with increased PW.
Small number of patients.
Variable PW programming in SCS appears to have clinical value, demonstrated by some patients improving their paresthesia-pain overlap, as well as the ability to increase and even 'steer' paresthesia coverage.
随着脊髓刺激 (SCS) 技术的进步,特别是可充电植入式技术的出现,患者现在可以选择更广泛的参数来治疗疼痛。特别是,可充电植入式脉冲发生器的脉冲宽度 (PW) 编程范围现在与射频系统相匹配(编程范围高达 1000 微秒)。本研究旨在探讨 SCS 中 PW 变化的影响。
了解脊髓刺激 (SCS) 中 PW 编程的效果。
对 PW 编程的技术和临床结果进行单中心、前瞻性、随机、单盲评估。
急性、门诊随访。
使用完全植入式 SCS 治疗慢性难治性腰痛和/或腿痛>3 个月的患者。使用每个患者不变的“走进来”程序,对广泛的(50-1000 微秒)编程 PW 设置进行编程。
我们发现时值和刺激阈的强度-时间参数分别为 295(242-326)微秒和 2.5(1.3-3.3)mA。所有患者“走出”程序的 PW 中位数为 400 微秒,比中值时值高约 48%(p=0.01),表明时值可能与患者偏好的刺激设置无关。我们发现,7/19 名患者选择了新的 PW 程序,这些程序使他们的感觉-疼痛重叠平均增加了 56%(p=0.047)。我们估计,10/19 名患者的感觉覆盖范围增加,8/19 名患者的感觉覆盖范围出现“尾端移位”,PW 增加。
患者数量较少。
SCS 中的可变 PW 编程似乎具有临床价值,一些患者的感觉-疼痛重叠得到改善,并且能够增加甚至“引导”感觉覆盖范围。