Suppr超能文献

¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 对比增强扫描用于评估坏死性淋巴结转移。

Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT for the assessment of necrotic lymph node metastases.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Head Neck. 2011 Mar;33(3):324-9. doi: 10.1002/hed.21447.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cystic lymph node metastasis (CLNM) is commonly found in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy in detecting cystic lymph node metastasis from tonsillar SCC between contrast-enhanced CT, ¹⁸F- fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients with a tonsillar SCC undergoing a pretreatment contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT followed by a neck dissection as a standard of reference were included. The contrast-enhanced CT part, the ¹⁸F-FDG-PET part, the non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT part, and the contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT were assessed separately for correct N classification and the differentiation of N0 versus N+. RESULTS.: Contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT are equally accurate for correct neck staging. Regarding pN0 versus pN+, contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT are superior to non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT (p = .017).

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT perform equally and better than non-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting CLNM in tonsillar SCC. Therefore, in patients scheduled for ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, we strongly suggest performing a contrast-enhanced ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, which is not routine in most centers.

摘要

背景

囊性淋巴结转移(CLNM)在人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关的扁桃体鳞状细胞癌(SCC)中较为常见。本研究旨在比较增强 CT、¹⁸F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)、非增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 和增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 检测扁桃体 SCC 囊性淋巴结转移的准确性。

方法

本研究共纳入 34 例接受治疗前增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 检查且随后行颈清扫术作为参考标准的扁桃体 SCC 患者。分别评估增强 CT 部分、¹⁸F-FDG-PET 部分、非增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 部分和增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 部分对正确 N 分类和 N0 与 N+的鉴别诊断。

结果

增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT、非增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 和增强 CT 对正确的颈部分期同样准确。对于 pN0 与 pN+,增强 CT 和增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 优于非增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT(p=0.017)。

结论

增强 CT 和增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 在检测扁桃体 SCC 中的 CLNM 方面与非增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 表现相当且优于后者。因此,对于计划行¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 检查的患者,我们强烈建议进行增强¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT 检查,而这在大多数中心并非常规检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验