• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

院外心搏骤停伴电击复律后仍为室颤患者的发生率和结局:一项基于大型人群队列的研究数据。

Incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation: Data from a large population-based cohort.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology and Acute Critical Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-15 Yamada-Oka, Suita City, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):956-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.015.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.015
PMID:20653086
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The increasing survival rates after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) are due mainly to improvements in the first 3 steps of the chain of survival. The aim of this study was to describe the temporal trends of OHCA incidence and outcomes with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation (VF) requiring advanced life support procedures.

METHODS

All our subjects were persons aged 18 years or more who had suffered OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology, were witnessed by bystanders, treated by emergency medical service (EMS), and had VF as initial rhythm. Our study was conducted in Osaka Prefecture, Japan from May 1, 1998 through December 31, 2006. Data were collected by EMS personnel using an Utstein-style database. We evaluated the temporal trends of incidence and outcomes of shock-resistant VF.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 8782 witnessed OHCA cases of presumed cardiac etiology. Among them, 1733 had VF as an initial rhythm, 392 of whom were shock-resistant. While the age-adjusted annual incidence of witnessed VF increased from 2.0 to 3.3 per 100,000 inhabitants, that of shock-resistant VF underwent little change during the study period. The proportion of shock-resistant VF among witnessed VF decreased from 37.0% to 19.0%. Neurologically intact 1-month survival rates after shock-resistant VF remained low at 5.6% even in 2006.

CONCLUSION

The actual incidence of shock-resistant VF has remained unchanged, and their outcomes continue to be dismal. Further efforts are required to reduce the mortality rates of such shock-resistant VF to achieve improved survival after OHCA.

摘要

背景

院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后的生存率提高主要归因于生存链前 3 步的改进。本研究旨在描述需要高级生命支持程序的耐电击性室颤(VF)的 OHCA 发生率和结局的时间趋势。

方法

我们的所有研究对象均为 18 岁或以上的患者,其经历了OHCA,有旁观者目击,接受了紧急医疗服务(EMS)的治疗,并且初始节律为VF。本研究于 1998 年 5 月 1 日至 2006 年 12 月 31 日在日本大阪府进行。数据由 EMS 人员使用乌斯太因(Utstein)风格的数据库收集。我们评估了耐电击性 VF 的发生率和结局的时间趋势。

结果

在研究期间,有 8782 例目击 OHCA 被认为是心脏原因。其中,1733 例有 VF 作为初始节律,392 例为耐电击性 VF。虽然年龄调整后的目击 VF 的年发生率从 2.0 增加到 3.3/10 万人,但耐电击性 VF 的发生率在研究期间几乎没有变化。耐电击性 VF 在目击 VF 中的比例从 37.0%下降到 19.0%。即使在 2006 年,耐电击性 VF 后神经功能完整的 1 个月生存率仍保持在 5.6%的低水平。

结论

耐电击性 VF 的实际发生率保持不变,其结局仍然不佳。需要进一步努力降低此类耐电击性 VF 的死亡率,以提高 OHCA 后的生存率。

相似文献

1
Incidence and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with shock-resistant ventricular fibrillation: Data from a large population-based cohort.院外心搏骤停伴电击复律后仍为室颤患者的发生率和结局:一项基于大型人群队列的研究数据。
Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):956-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.015.
2
The changing incidence of ventricular fibrillation in Milwaukee, Wisconsin (1992-2002).威斯康星州密尔沃基市室颤发病率的变化情况(1992 - 2002年)
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):52-60. doi: 10.1080/10903120500366961.
3
Trends in treated ventricular fibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: ischemic compared to non-ischemic heart disease.院外心脏骤停时治疗心室颤动的趋势:缺血性心脏病与非缺血性心脏病的比较
Resuscitation. 2005 Oct;67(1):51-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.04.015.
4
Subsequent ventricular fibrillation and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests presenting with PEA or asystole.院外心脏骤停表现为无脉电活动或心搏停止后的心室颤动及生存情况。
Resuscitation. 2008 Oct;79(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
5
Long-term changes in the incidence of out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation.院外室颤发生率的长期变化。
Resuscitation. 2011 Jul;82(7):825-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.02.030. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
6
Comparison of neurological outcomes following witnessed out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation defibrillated with either biphasic or monophasic automated external defibrillators.目击到院外心室颤动后使用双相或单相自动体外除颤器除颤的神经学结果比较。
Emerg Med J. 2009 Jul;26(7):492-6. doi: 10.1136/emj.2008.059865.
7
Ventricular fibrillation in pediatric cardiac arrest.小儿心脏骤停中的心室颤动
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 May;13(5):525-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.12.019. Epub 2006 Mar 28.
8
A Utstein-style analysis of prognostic factors related to survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Akita-City, Japan.日本秋田市院外心脏骤停生存相关预后因素的Utstein式分析。
Tohoku J Exp Med. 2001 Jun;194(2):107-19. doi: 10.1620/tjem.194.107.
9
The Dublin cardiac arrest registry: temporal improvement in survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest reflects improved pre-hospital emergency care.都柏林心脏骤停登记处:院外心脏骤停存活率的时间改善反映了院前急救护理的改善。
Europace. 2011 Aug;13(8):1157-65. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur092. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
10
Incidence and survival rate of bystander-witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with cardiac etiology in Osaka, Japan: a population-based study according to the Utstein style.日本大阪心源性院外心脏骤停旁观者目击事件的发病率和生存率:一项基于人群的Utstein模式研究
Resuscitation. 2003 Dec;59(3):329-35. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(03)00241-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Which Matters More for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Survival: Witnessed Arrest or Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation?对于院外心脏骤停存活而言,哪个因素更重要:有人目睹骤停还是旁观者心肺复苏?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e038427. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038427. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
2
A Narrative Review of Drug Therapy in Adult and Pediatric Cardiac Arrest.成人及小儿心脏骤停药物治疗的叙述性综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 6;24(6):163. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2406163. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Health-related quality of life one year after refractory cardiac arrest treated with conventional or extracorporeal CPR; a secondary analysis of the INCEPTION-trial.
常规或体外心肺复苏治疗难治性心脏骤停一年后的健康相关生活质量;INCEPTION试验的二次分析
Resusc Plus. 2024 May 30;19:100669. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100669. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Temporal trends in the incidence and outcomes of shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.院外心脏骤停中休克难治性室颤的发病率及转归的时间趋势
Resusc Plus. 2024 Mar 8;18:100597. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2024.100597. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence.用于难治性心脏骤停的体外心肺复苏:当前实践与证据概述
Neth Heart J. 2024 Apr;32(4):148-155. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01853-5. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
6
Is it time to update our defibrillation strategies for refractory ventricular fibrillation?是时候更新我们针对难治性室颤的除颤策略了吗?
Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;19(3):835-837. doi: 10.1007/s11739-023-03504-4. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
7
Defibrillation strategies for refractory ventricular fibrillation out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.难治性院外心脏骤停伴心室颤动的除颤策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2023 Sep;28(5):e13075. doi: 10.1111/anec.13075. Epub 2023 Jul 22.
8
The first case series analysis on efficacy of esmolol injection for in-hospital cardiac arrest patients with refractory shockable rhythms in China.中国首个关于艾司洛尔注射液对难治性可电击心律的院内心脏骤停患者疗效的病例系列分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 30;13:930245. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.930245. eCollection 2022.
9
Feasibility of prehospital esmolol for refractory ventricular fibrillation.院前使用艾司洛尔治疗顽固性心室颤动的可行性。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Apr 9;3(2):e12700. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12700. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Efficacy of AutoPulse for Mechanical Chest Compression in Patients with Shock-Resistant Ventricular Fibrillation.AutoPulse 在对伴有电击抵抗性心室颤动休克患者进行机械胸外按压中的效果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 23;19(5):2557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052557.