Department of Pediatrics, Kosair Children's Hospital, University of Louisville, KY, USA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;17(7):687-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00788.x.
Clavicle fractures are among the most common orthopedic injuries in children. Diagnosis typically involves radiographs, which expose children to radiation and may consume significant time and resources. Our objective was to determine if bedside emergency department (ED) ultrasound (US) is an accurate alternative to radiography.
This was a prospective study of bedside US for diagnosing clavicle fractures. A convenience sample of children ages 1-18 years with shoulder injuries requiring radiographs was enrolled. Bedside US imaging and an unblinded interpretation were completed by a pediatric emergency physician (EP) prior to radiographs. A second interpreter, a pediatric EP attending physician with extensive US experience, determined a final interpretation of the US images at a later date. This final interpretation was blinded to both clinical and radiography outcomes. The reference standard was an attending radiologist's interpretation of radiographs. The primary outcome was the accuracy of the blinded US interpretation for detecting clavicle fractures compared to the reference standard. Secondary outcome measures included the interrater reliability of the unblinded bedside and the blinded physicians' interpretations and the FACES pain scores (range, 0-5) for US and radiograph imaging.
One-hundred patients were included in the study, of whom 43 had clavicle fractures by radiography. The final US interpretation had 95% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83% to 99%) and 96% specificity (95% CI = 87% to 99%), and overall accuracy was 96%, with 96 congruent readings. Positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs, respectively) were 95% (95% CI = 83% to 99%) and 96% (95% CI = 87% to 99%), respectively. Interrater reliability (kappa) was 0.74 (95% CI = 0.60 to 0.88). FACES pain scores were available for the 86 subjects who were at least 5 years old. Pain scores were similar during US and radiography.
Compared to radiographs, bedside US can accurately diagnose pediatric clavicle fractures. US causes no more discomfort than radiography when detecting clavicle fractures. Given US's advantage of no radiation, pediatric EPs should consider this application.
锁骨骨折是儿童中最常见的骨科损伤之一。诊断通常需要 X 光片,但 X 光会使儿童暴露在辐射下,并且可能会消耗大量时间和资源。我们的目标是确定床边急诊部(ED)超声(US)是否是 X 光片的准确替代方法。
这是一项关于床边 US 诊断锁骨骨折的前瞻性研究。我们招募了因肩部受伤需要 X 光片的 1-18 岁儿童的便利样本。在进行 X 光片之前,由儿科急诊医师(EP)进行床边 US 成像和非盲解读。第二位解读者是一位具有丰富 US 经验的儿科 EP 主治医生,他在稍后的日期确定了 US 图像的最终解读。该最终解读对临床和 X 光结果均为盲法。参考标准是放射科医生对 X 光片的解读。主要结局是与参考标准相比,盲法 US 解读检测锁骨骨折的准确性。次要结局指标包括未盲床边和盲法医生解读的 interrater 可靠性以及 US 和 X 光成像的 FACES 疼痛评分(范围为 0-5)。
共有 100 名患者参与了这项研究,其中 43 名患者的 X 光片显示锁骨骨折。最终的 US 解读具有 95%的敏感性(95%置信区间 [CI] = 83%至 99%)和 96%的特异性(95% CI = 87%至 99%),总体准确性为 96%,其中 96 次结果一致。阳性和阴性预测值(PPV 和 NPV,分别)分别为 95%(95% CI = 83%至 99%)和 96%(95% CI = 87%至 99%)。 interrater 可靠性(kappa)为 0.74(95% CI = 0.60 至 0.88)。有 86 名年龄至少为 5 岁的受试者可获得 FACES 疼痛评分。US 和 X 光片检查时疼痛评分相似。
与 X 光片相比,床边 US 可以准确诊断儿科锁骨骨折。在检测锁骨骨折时,US 引起的不适并不比 X 光片多。鉴于 US 无辐射的优势,儿科 EP 应考虑这种应用。