Suppr超能文献

5-0 聚己内酯缝线与 6-0 聚丙烯缝线用于浅层缝合的美容效果相当。

Equal cosmetic outcomes with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 versus 6-0 polypropylene for superficial closures.

机构信息

Laser and Dermatologic Surgery Center, Chesterfield, Missouri 63017, USA.

出版信息

Dermatol Surg. 2010 Jul;36(7):1126-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01594.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous sutures should provide an aesthetically pleasing result. After placing subcutaneous sutures, enough absorbable suture often remains for the superficial closure. Mohs surgeons often use a nonabsorbable suture to close the superficial layer to obtain cosmetically elegant results, but using this additional suture is less cost effective than using the remaining absorbable suture.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the cosmetic results of simple running sutures using an absorbable suture material (5-0 poliglecaprone-25) with those of a nonabsorbable suture (6-0 polypropylene) in primary closures of suitable facial Mohs defects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with 57 facial Mohs surgery defects appropriate for multilayer primary repair had the defects prospectively randomized into a side-by-side comparison. After closure of the deep layers with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 sutures, half of the wound was closed with a 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 simple running suture, and the other half of the wound was closed with a 6-0 polypropylene simple running suture. The investigators blindly determined the cosmetically superior side of the closure at 1 week and 4 months after suture removal.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients (48 total defects) completed the study. At the 4-month follow-up, 85% (41/48) did not show any difference between poliglecaprone-25 and polypropylene, 4% (2/48) had better outcomes with poliglecaprone-25, and 10% (5/48) had better outcomes with polypropylene. There was no statistically significant cosmetic difference between the two closure types. Wound complications such as infection, hematoma, and dehiscence did not occur in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

In primary closures of facial defects, using 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 or 6-0 polypropylene for the superficial closure did not affect the cosmetic result. Therefore, 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 provides a comparable and cost-effective alternative to nonabsorbable sutures for epidermal approximation in layered closures.

摘要

背景

皮内缝合应达到美观的效果。皮下缝合后,通常会有足够的可吸收缝线用于浅层缝合。Mohs 外科医生通常使用不可吸收缝线来闭合浅层以获得美观的效果,但使用这种额外的缝线不如使用剩余的可吸收缝线经济有效。

目的

比较使用可吸收缝线(5-0 聚己内酯)和不可吸收缝线(6-0 聚丙烯)进行单层修复的简单连续缝合在合适的面部 Mohs 缺损初次闭合中的美容效果。

材料和方法

52 例 57 个面部 Mohs 手术缺损适合多层初次修复的患者前瞻性随机分组进行对比。深层用 5-0 聚己内酯-25 缝线闭合后,一半的伤口用 5-0 聚己内酯-25 简单连续缝线闭合,另一半用 6-0 聚丙烯简单连续缝线闭合。研究人员在缝线拆除后 1 周和 4 个月时盲目确定闭合的美容优势侧。

结果

44 例患者(48 个总缺损)完成了研究。在 4 个月的随访中,85%(41/48)的患者在聚己内酯-25 和聚丙烯之间没有差异,4%(2/48)的患者聚己内酯-25 效果更好,10%(5/48)的患者聚丙烯效果更好。两种闭合类型之间没有统计学上的美容差异。所有患者均未发生感染、血肿和裂开等伤口并发症。

结论

在面部缺损的初次闭合中,使用 5-0 聚己内酯-25 或 6-0 聚丙烯进行浅层闭合不会影响美容效果。因此,5-0 聚己内酯-25 为分层闭合中表皮近似的非吸收缝线提供了一种可比较且具有成本效益的替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验