Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Radiology. 2010 Aug;256(2):585-97. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10091157.
To assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of state-of-the-art noninvasive diagnostic imaging strategies in patients with a transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor stroke who are suspected of having carotid artery stenosis (CAS).
All prospectively evaluated patients provided informed consent, and the local ethics committee approved this study. Diagnostic performance, treatment, long-term events, quality of life, and costs resulting from strategies employing duplex ultrasonography (US), computed tomographic (CT) angiography, contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography, and combinations of these modalities were modeled in a decision tree and Markov model. Data sources included a prospective diagnostic cohort study, a meta-analysis, and a review of the literature. Outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and net health benefits (QALY-equivalents), with a willingness-to-pay threshold of euro 50,000 per QALY and a societal perspective. The strategy with the highest net health benefit was considered the most cost effective. Extensive one-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to explore the effect of varying parameter values were performed. The reference case analysis assumed that patients underwent surgery 2-4 weeks after the first symptoms, and the effect of earlier intervention was explored.
The reference case analysis showed that duplex US combined with CT angiography and surgery for 70%-99% stenoses was the most cost-effective strategy, with a net health benefit of 13.587 and 15.542 QALY-equivalents in men and women, respectively. In men, the CT angiography strategy with a 70%-99% cutoff yielded slightly more QALYs, at an incremental cost of euro 71,419 per QALY, compared with duplex US combined with CT angiography. In patients with a high-risk profile, in patients with a high prior probability of disease, and when patients could be treated within 2 weeks after the first symptoms, the CT angiography strategy with surgery for 50%-99% stenoses was the most cost-effective strategy.
In diagnosing CAS, duplex US should be the initial test, and, if its results are positive, CT angiography should be performed; patients with 70%-99% stenoses should then undergo carotid endarterectomy. In patients with a high-risk profile, a high probability of CAS, or who can undergo surgery without delay, immediate CT angiography and surgery for 50%-99% stenoses is indicated.
评估在疑似颈内动脉狭窄(CAS)的短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或小卒中患者中,使用最先进的无创性诊断成像策略的有效性和成本效益。
所有经过前瞻性评估的患者均提供了知情同意,当地伦理委员会批准了本研究。在决策树和马尔可夫模型中对使用双功能超声(US)、计算机断层血管造影(CTA)、对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)和这些方式组合的策略的诊断性能、治疗、长期结果、生活质量和成本进行建模。数据来源包括前瞻性诊断队列研究、荟萃分析和文献回顾。结果是成本、质量调整生命年(QALY)、增量成本效益比和净健康收益(QALY 等效值),支付意愿阈值为每个 QALY 50000 欧元,从社会角度考虑。具有最高净健康收益的策略被认为是最具成本效益的。进行了广泛的单向、双向和概率敏感性分析,以探讨参数值变化的影响。参考病例分析假设患者在首次症状后 2-4 周内接受手术,并且探讨了更早干预的效果。
参考病例分析表明,对于 70%-99%狭窄,双功能 US 联合 CTA 和手术是最具成本效益的策略,男性和女性的净健康收益分别为 13.587 和 15.542 QALY 等效值。在男性中,与双功能 US 联合 CTA 相比,70%-99%截断值的 CTA 策略在获得略多 QALY 的情况下,增量成本为每个 QALY 71419 欧元。在高风险患者、疾病高先验概率患者和患者可以在首次症状后 2 周内接受治疗的情况下,对于 50%-99%狭窄,CTA 联合手术是最具成本效益的策略。
在诊断 CAS 时,双功能 US 应作为初始检查,如果结果阳性,则应进行 CTA;对于 70%-99%狭窄的患者,应进行颈动脉内膜切除术。在高风险患者、高 CAS 概率或可以毫不延迟地进行手术的患者中,建议立即进行 50%-99%狭窄的 CTA 和手术。