Suppr超能文献

安全建议发布后,亚洲一家癌症中心促红细胞生成素刺激剂处方的影响

Impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent prescribing at an Asian cancer center, after release of safety advisories.

作者信息

Chan Qingru, Chan Alexandre

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2011 Dec;17(4):350-9. doi: 10.1177/1078155210378058. Epub 2010 Jul 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) provide symptom relief and decrease blood transfusion support among patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. However, due to increased cardiovascular events associated with off-labeled usage of ESAs, the FDA incorporated black box warnings in 2007 to include the following key points: (a) ESAs should be used only to treat anemia due to concomitant chemotherapy of a noncurative intent and (b) target hemogloblin level should not exceed 12 g/dL. Thus, this study was designed to compare the prescribing of epoetin alfa at National Cancer Centre Singapore before and after FDA black box updates. The secondary objective of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of efficacy and toxicity monitoring of epoetin alfa.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-centered, drug utilization review. Patients who received at least one dose of epoetin alfa were included in this study. Utilization of epoetin alfa was segregated into two time periods: January 1, 2005 to October 15, 2007 (S1, Pre-safety advisories changes) and October 16, 2007 to December 10, 2009 (S2, Post-safety advisories changes).

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were prescribed epoetin alfa at NCCS during the two time periods. However, only 139 patients were eligible for analysis, with 91 and 48 patients in S1 and S2 respectively. After safety advisory changes, there were more (18.2%) metastatic patients and fewer (19.1%) patients with cardiovascular co-morbidities who were prescribed epoetin alfa, the mean hemogloblin level when epoetin alfa was initiated was lowered by 0.46 g/dL, more (43%) dose adjustments were made for 'excessive' responders and more (40.7%) patients had fewer blood transfusions after epoetin alfa therapy (p < 0.05). However, blood pressure control, iron studies, and supplementation did not improve (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that oncologists have generally adopted the new ESA safety warnings and adjusted prescribing habits.

摘要

背景

促红细胞生成素(ESAs)可缓解化疗所致贫血患者的症状并减少输血支持。然而,由于与ESAs的非标签使用相关的心血管事件增加,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)在2007年纳入了黑框警告,包括以下要点:(a)ESAs仅应用于治疗因非根治性意图的伴随化疗所致的贫血,且(b)目标血红蛋白水平不应超过12g/dL。因此,本研究旨在比较新加坡国立癌症中心在FDA黑框更新前后促红细胞生成素α的处方情况。本研究的次要目的是评估促红细胞生成素α疗效和毒性监测的适宜性。

方法

这是一项回顾性、单中心的药物利用审查。本研究纳入了接受至少一剂促红细胞生成素α的患者。促红细胞生成素α的使用分为两个时间段:2005年1月1日至2007年10月15日(S1,安全建议变更前)和2007年10月16日至2009年12月10日(S2,安全建议变更后)。

结果

在这两个时间段内,新加坡国立癌症中心共有171例患者被处方促红细胞生成素α。然而,只有139例患者符合分析条件,S1和S2分别有91例和48例患者。安全建议变更后,被处方促红细胞生成素α的转移性患者更多(18.2%),心血管合并症患者更少(19.1%),开始使用促红细胞生成素α时的平均血红蛋白水平降低了0.46g/dL,更多(43%)“反应过度”的患者进行了剂量调整,更多(40.7%)的患者在促红细胞生成素α治疗后输血次数减少(p<0.05)。然而,血压控制、铁代谢研究和补充治疗并无改善(p>0.05)。

结论

本研究表明,肿瘤学家普遍采用了新的ESA安全警告并调整了处方习惯。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验