Bridges David
University of East Anglia and University of Cambridge.
Educ Theory. 2010;60(3):299-324. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2010.00360.x.
In this essay David Bridges argues that since most families choose to realize their responsibility for the major part of their children's education through state schools, then the way in which the state constructs parents' relation with these schools is one of its primary levers on parenting itself. Bridges then examines the way in which parent-school relations have been defined in England through government and quasi-government interventions over the last forty-five years, tracing these through an awakening interest in the relation between social class and unequal school success in the 1960s, passing through the discourse of accountability in the 1970s, marketization in the 1980s and 1990s, performativity extending from this period into the first decade of the twenty-first century, and, most recently, more direct interventions into parenting itself and the regulation of school relations with parents in the interests of safeguarding children. These have not, however, been entirely discrete policy themes, and the positive and pragmatic employment of the discourse of partnership has run throughout this period, albeit with different points of emphasis on the precise terms of such partnership.
在本文中,大卫·布里奇斯认为,由于大多数家庭选择通过公立学校来履行其对孩子大部分教育的责任,那么国家构建家长与这些学校关系的方式就是其影响育儿方式的主要手段之一。布里奇斯接着考察了过去45年里英国通过政府和准政府干预来界定家长与学校关系的方式,追溯了这些干预,从20世纪60年代对社会阶层与学校教育不平等成就之间关系的兴趣觉醒,到70年代的问责制话语,80年代和90年代的市场化,从这一时期延伸至21世纪第一个十年的绩效责任制,以及最近为保护儿童利益而对育儿本身进行的更直接干预和对学校与家长关系的监管。然而,这些并非完全是离散的政策主题,伙伴关系话语的积极和务实运用贯穿了这一时期,尽管在这种伙伴关系的确切条款上有不同的侧重点。