Cimen Haydar, Yengin Esengün
Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey.
J Oral Implantol. 2012 Feb;38(1):21-6. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00033. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of 2 different abutment types on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone and within the implant-abutment complex using 3-dimensional finite element analysis. A simple cylindrical implant (4 × 11 mm) was used in this study for efficacy calculation. One model simulated a 4.00-mm-diameter abutment connection, and the other was narrower, using a 3.2-mm-diameter abutment connection assuming a platform-switching configuration. The stress level in the cervical bone area at the implant was greatly reduced when the narrow-diameter abutment was connected compared with the regular-sized one, despite the fact that the stress level in the implant-abutment complex was increased. The results obtained in the platform-switching model can contribute to reduce the stress level at the implant-bone interface area. Results from this study showed the platform-switching procedure has the biomechanical advantage of shifting the stress concentration area away from the cervical bone-implant interface. The disadvantage of the configuration is the increasing stress in the abutment and implant-abutment junction.
本研究的目的是使用三维有限元分析,研究两种不同基台类型对种植体周围骨组织以及种植体-基台复合体内部应力分布的影响。本研究使用一个简单的圆柱形种植体(4×11毫米)进行效能计算。一个模型模拟直径4.00毫米的基台连接,另一个模型采用较窄的直径3.2毫米的基台连接,假设为平台转换结构。与常规尺寸基台连接相比,连接窄直径基台时种植体颈部骨区域的应力水平大幅降低,尽管种植体-基台复合体中的应力水平有所增加。在平台转换模型中获得的结果有助于降低种植体-骨界面区域的应力水平。本研究结果表明,平台转换程序具有将应力集中区域从颈部骨-种植体界面转移开的生物力学优势。该结构的缺点是基台以及种植体-基台连接处的应力增加。