Derejko Paweł, Bodalski Robert, Szumowski Łukasz J, Kozłowski Dariusz, Urbanek Piotr, Orczykowski Michał, Zakrzewska-Koperska Joanna, Kepski Roman, Chojnowska Lidia, Polańska Magdalena, Szufladowicz Ewa, Wójcik Anna, Sacher Frédéric, Haïssaguerre Michel, Walczak Franciszek
Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Dec;33(12):1518-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02847.x.
There is some disagreement concerning the minimal value of the interval between components of double potentials (DPs interval) that allows distinguishing complete and incomplete block in the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI).
To assess clinical utility of the relationship between atrial flutter cycle length (AFL CL) and the DPs interval.
Ablation of the CTI was performed in 87 patients during AFL (245 ± 40 ms). Subsequently, DPs were recorded during proximal coronary sinus pacing at sites close to a gap in the ablation line and after achievement of complete isthmus block.
We noted strong correlation between AFL CL and the DPs interval after achievement of isthmus block (r = 0.73). The mean DPs interval was 95.3 ± 18.3 ms (range 60-136 ms) and 123.3 ± 24.3 ms (range 87-211 ms) during incomplete and complete isthmus block, respectively (P < 0.001). When expressed as a percentage of AFL CL, this interval was 35.7 ± 3.5% AFL CL (range 28-40.2%) and 50.4 ± 6.9% AFL CL (range 39-72%) during incomplete and complete isthmus block, respectively (P < 0.001). A cutoff value of 40% of AFL CL identified CTI block with 96.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity.
The interval between DPs after achievement of block in the CTI correlates with AFL CL. The DPs interval expressed as a percentage of AFL CL allows better distinguishing between complete and incomplete isthmus block compared to standard method based on milliseconds. The DPs interval below 40% of AFL CL indicates sites close to a gap in the ablation line.
关于双电位(DPs)各成分之间的间隔(DPs间隔)的最小值,在区分三尖瓣峡部(CTI)的完全性和不完全性阻滞方面存在一些分歧。
评估心房扑动周期长度(AFL CL)与DPs间隔之间关系的临床实用性。
对87例心房扑动患者(AFL CL为245±40 ms)进行CTI消融。随后,在靠近消融线间隙的部位进行冠状窦近端起搏时以及实现峡部完全性阻滞后记录DPs。
我们注意到在实现峡部阻滞后,AFL CL与DPs间隔之间存在强相关性(r = 0.73)。在峡部不完全性阻滞和完全性阻滞期间,平均DPs间隔分别为95.3±18.3 ms(范围60 - 136 ms)和123.3±24.3 ms(范围87 - 211 ms)(P < 0.001)。当以AFL CL的百分比表示时,该间隔在峡部不完全性阻滞和完全性阻滞期间分别为35.7±3.5% AFL CL(范围28 - 40.2%)和50.4±6.9% AFL CL(范围39 - 72%)(P < 0.001)。AFL CL的40%这一切断值识别CTI阻滞的敏感性为96.7%,特异性为100%。
CTI实现阻滞后的DPs间隔与AFL CL相关。与基于毫秒的标准方法相比,以AFL CL的百分比表示的DPs间隔能更好地区分峡部的完全性和不完全性阻滞。低于AFL CL 40%的DPs间隔表明靠近消融线的间隙部位。