Suppr超能文献

在巴西圣保罗,使用保密性单位排除(CUE)的献血者的人口统计学特征和血清学标志物流行率:对巴西修改 CUE 政策的影响。

Demographic characteristics and prevalence of serologic markers among blood donors who use confidential unit exclusion (CUE) in São Paulo, Brazil: implications for modification of CUE policies in Brazil.

机构信息

Fundação Pró-Sangue, Blood Center of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2011 Jan;51(1):191-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02799.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated demographic profiles and prevalence of serologic markers among donors who used confidential unit exclusion (CUE) to assess the effectiveness of CUE and guide public policies regarding the use of CUE for enhancing safety versus jeopardizing the blood supply by dropping CUE.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of whole blood donations at a large public blood center in São Paulo from July 2007 through June 2009, compared demographic data, and confirmed serologic results among donors who used and who have never used CUE (CUE never).

RESULTS

There were 265,550 whole blood units collected from 181,418 donors from July 2007 through June 2009. A total of 9658 (3.6%) units were discarded, 2973 (1.1%) because CUE was used at the current donation (CUE now) and 6685 (2.5%) because CUE was used in the past (CUE past). The CUE rate was highest among donors with less than 8 years of education (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-3.08). CUE now donations were associated with higher positive infectious disease marker rates than CUE never donations (OR, 1.41; CI, 1.13-1.77), whereas CUE past donations were not (OR, 1.04; CI, 0.75-1.45).

CONCLUSION

The CUE process results in a high rate of unit discard. CUE use on an individual donation appears predictive of a high-risk marker-positive donation and, thus, appears to contribute modestly to blood safety. The policy of discarding units from donors who have previously CUE-positive donations does not improve safety and should be discontinued.

摘要

背景

本研究评估了使用保密性单位排除(CUE)的献血者的人口统计学特征和血清标志物流行率,以评估 CUE 的效果,并指导关于使用 CUE 提高安全性与因放弃 CUE 而危及血液供应的公共政策。

研究设计和方法

我们对 2007 年 7 月至 2009 年 6 月期间在圣保罗一家大型公立血库采集的全血献血者进行了横断面分析,比较了使用和从未使用 CUE(CUE 从未)的献血者的人口统计学数据和确认的血清学结果。

结果

2007 年 7 月至 2009 年 6 月期间,从 181418 名献血者中采集了 265550 个全血单位。共有 9658 个(3.6%)单位被丢弃,2973 个(1.1%)是因为当前献血时使用了 CUE(CUE 现在),6685 个(2.5%)是因为过去使用了 CUE(CUE 过去)。受教育程度低于 8 年的献血者中 CUE 率最高(比值比 [OR],2.78;95%置信区间 [CI],2.51-3.08)。与 CUE 从未献血者相比,CUE 现在献血者的传染性疾病标志物阳性率更高(OR,1.41;CI,1.13-1.77),而 CUE 过去献血者则不然(OR,1.04;CI,0.75-1.45)。

结论

CUE 过程导致了高比例的单位丢弃。在单个献血中使用 CUE 似乎预示着高风险标志物阳性献血,因此对血液安全略有贡献。从以前 CUE 阳性献血者中丢弃单位的政策并没有提高安全性,应该停止。

相似文献

2
Evaluation of 6 years of confidential unit exclusion at the Belgian Red Cross Flanders Blood Service.
Vox Sang. 2014 May;106(4):354-60. doi: 10.1111/vox.12115. Epub 2013 Nov 30.
3
Profile of blood donors with serologic tests reactive for the presence of syphilis in São Paulo, Brazil.
Transfusion. 2009 Feb;49(2):330-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2008.01977.x.
5
Demographics and serological profile of blood donors who opt for the confidential unit exclusion in a blood bank in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2021 Sep 3;63:e69. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202163069. eCollection 2021.
9
Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion on Iranian blood donors: An 11-year experience.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2021 Jan-Jun;15(1):57-61. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_152_18. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
10
Positive serology for viral hepatitis and donor self-exclusion in Southern Brazil.
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2013 Jul-Aug;46(4):403-10. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0094-2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Subjective donor deferral as a tool for increased blood transfusion safety: A cross-sectional observational study.
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 14;4(4):e424. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.424. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Demographics and serological profile of blood donors who opt for the confidential unit exclusion in a blood bank in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2021 Sep 3;63:e69. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202163069. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion on Iranian blood donors: An 11-year experience.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2021 Jan-Jun;15(1):57-61. doi: 10.4103/ajts.AJTS_152_18. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
4
First-time Blood Donors Are Double-edged Swords for Blood Transfusion Centers: A Retrospective Study in Southwest Iran.
Turk J Haematol. 2020 Feb 20;37(1):30-35. doi: 10.4274/tjh.galenos.2019.2019.0166. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
5
A study on confidential unit exclusion at Shiraz Blood Transfusion Center, Iran.
Asian J Transfus Sci. 2016 Jul-Dec;10(2):132-5. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.187939.
7
Contribution of the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study (REDS) to research on blood transfusion safety in Brazil.
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2014 Mar;36(2):152-8. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20140033.
10
Confidential donation confirmation as a alternative exclusion.
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter. 2011;33(4):251-2. doi: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110068.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing confidential unit exclusions in blood donors.
Vox Sang. 2010 Apr;98(3 Pt 1):e231-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01250.x. Epub 2009 Sep 18.
2
Evaluation of the confidential unit exclusion form: the Canadian Blood Services experience.
Vox Sang. 2010 Feb;98(2):138-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2009.01236.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
4
Human immunodeficiency virus test-seeking motivation in blood donors, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vox Sang. 2006 Apr;90(3):170-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00743.x.
7
Current impact of the confidential unit exclusion option.
Transfusion. 2004 May;44(5):651-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2004.03311.x.
8
HIV-related behaviours among voluntary blood donors in Hong Kong.
AIDS Care. 2002 Aug;14(4):481-92. doi: 10.1080/09540120208629667.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验