Fundação Pró-Sangue, Blood Center of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Transfusion. 2011 Jan;51(1):191-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02799.x.
This study evaluated demographic profiles and prevalence of serologic markers among donors who used confidential unit exclusion (CUE) to assess the effectiveness of CUE and guide public policies regarding the use of CUE for enhancing safety versus jeopardizing the blood supply by dropping CUE.
We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of whole blood donations at a large public blood center in São Paulo from July 2007 through June 2009, compared demographic data, and confirmed serologic results among donors who used and who have never used CUE (CUE never).
There were 265,550 whole blood units collected from 181,418 donors from July 2007 through June 2009. A total of 9658 (3.6%) units were discarded, 2973 (1.1%) because CUE was used at the current donation (CUE now) and 6685 (2.5%) because CUE was used in the past (CUE past). The CUE rate was highest among donors with less than 8 years of education (odds ratio [OR], 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-3.08). CUE now donations were associated with higher positive infectious disease marker rates than CUE never donations (OR, 1.41; CI, 1.13-1.77), whereas CUE past donations were not (OR, 1.04; CI, 0.75-1.45).
The CUE process results in a high rate of unit discard. CUE use on an individual donation appears predictive of a high-risk marker-positive donation and, thus, appears to contribute modestly to blood safety. The policy of discarding units from donors who have previously CUE-positive donations does not improve safety and should be discontinued.
本研究评估了使用保密性单位排除(CUE)的献血者的人口统计学特征和血清标志物流行率,以评估 CUE 的效果,并指导关于使用 CUE 提高安全性与因放弃 CUE 而危及血液供应的公共政策。
我们对 2007 年 7 月至 2009 年 6 月期间在圣保罗一家大型公立血库采集的全血献血者进行了横断面分析,比较了使用和从未使用 CUE(CUE 从未)的献血者的人口统计学数据和确认的血清学结果。
2007 年 7 月至 2009 年 6 月期间,从 181418 名献血者中采集了 265550 个全血单位。共有 9658 个(3.6%)单位被丢弃,2973 个(1.1%)是因为当前献血时使用了 CUE(CUE 现在),6685 个(2.5%)是因为过去使用了 CUE(CUE 过去)。受教育程度低于 8 年的献血者中 CUE 率最高(比值比 [OR],2.78;95%置信区间 [CI],2.51-3.08)。与 CUE 从未献血者相比,CUE 现在献血者的传染性疾病标志物阳性率更高(OR,1.41;CI,1.13-1.77),而 CUE 过去献血者则不然(OR,1.04;CI,0.75-1.45)。
CUE 过程导致了高比例的单位丢弃。在单个献血中使用 CUE 似乎预示着高风险标志物阳性献血,因此对血液安全略有贡献。从以前 CUE 阳性献血者中丢弃单位的政策并没有提高安全性,应该停止。