School of Psychology, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Support Care Cancer. 2010 Dec;18(12):1597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0962-2. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a self-help workbook for improving adjustment for breast cancer survivors.
An RCT compared the workbook (n = 20) with no-workbook controls (n = 20). Coping, traumatic stress and quality of life were measured at baseline, then 3 and 6 months later.
No interactions were found. A significant group main effect was found for venting coping; controls used less venting coping than workbook participants (p = 0.034). A significant time main effect was obtained for cognitive functioning (p = 0.003). Reliable change indices showed a trend towards a protective effect across all coping measures for workbook participants compared to controls. Qualitative feedback suggested that participants felt well supported by the intervention, but would have preferred receiving it during treatment.
While trends showed some promise for improving coping, endorsement for the workbook was not obtained. The difficulties encountered in recruiting survivors and the resulting implications regarding the feasibility of offering self-help resources to this population are discussed.
本研究旨在评估自助手册对改善乳腺癌幸存者适应能力的疗效。
随机对照试验将手册组(n=20)与无手册对照组(n=20)进行比较。在基线、3 个月和 6 个月后测量应对方式、创伤后应激和生活质量。
未发现交互作用。在发泄应对方式方面,手册组比对照组有显著的组间主要效应(p=0.034)。认知功能方面存在显著的时间主效应(p=0.003)。可靠变化指标显示,与对照组相比,手册组在所有应对措施方面都有保护作用的趋势。定性反馈表明,参与者对干预措施感到非常满意,但希望在治疗期间接受该干预措施。
虽然趋势显示在改善应对方式方面有一定的前景,但对该手册的认可尚未获得。讨论了招募幸存者所遇到的困难以及对向这一人群提供自助资源的可行性的影响。