Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Oncologie Médicale, 232 Boulevard de St Marguerite, 13273 Marseille Cedex 9, France.
Oncologist. 2010;15(8):799-809. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0029. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
The Hermine study observed the use of trastuzumab for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in routine practice, including patients who received trastuzumab treatment beyond progression (TBP).
The study observed 623 patients for > or = 2 years. Treatment was given according to oncologists' normal clinical practices. Endpoints included duration of treatment, efficacy, and cardiac safety. The TBP subanalysis compared overall survival (OS) in 177 patients who received first-line trastuzumab and either continued trastuzumab for > or = 30 days following progression or stopped at or before progression.
The median treatment duration was 13.3 months. In the first-, second-, and third-line or beyond treatment groups, the median time to progression (TTP) were 10.3 months, 9.0 months, and 6.3 months, and the median OS times were 30.3 months, 27.1 months, and 23.2 months, respectively. Heart failure was observed in 2.6% of patients, although no cardiac-associated deaths occurred. In the TBP subanalysis, the median OS duration from treatment initiation and time of disease progression were longer in patients who continued receiving trastuzumab TBP (>27.8 months and 21.3 months, respectively) than in those who stopped (16.8 months and 4.6 months, respectively). However, the groups were not completely comparable, because patients who continued trastuzumab TBP had better prognoses at treatment initiation. The median TTP was longer in patients who continued trastuzumab TBP (10.2 months) than in those who stopped (7.1 months).
The Hermine findings confirm that the pivotal trials of first-line trastuzumab treatment in MBC patients are applicable in clinical practice. The subanalysis suggests that trastuzumab TBP offers a survival benefit to MBC patients treated with first-line trastuzumab.
Hermine 研究观察了曲妥珠单抗在转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中的常规应用,包括曲妥珠单抗治疗进展后(TBP)的患者。
该研究观察了 623 例患者,观察时间超过或等于 2 年。治疗按照肿瘤医生的常规临床实践进行。终点包括治疗持续时间、疗效和心脏安全性。TBP 亚分析比较了接受一线曲妥珠单抗治疗的 177 例患者的总生存期(OS),这些患者在进展后继续接受曲妥珠单抗治疗>或=30 天或在进展前或进展时停止治疗。
中位治疗持续时间为 13.3 个月。在一线、二线和三线或以上治疗组中,中位无进展生存期(TTP)分别为 10.3 个月、9.0 个月和 6.3 个月,中位 OS 时间分别为 30.3 个月、27.1 个月和 23.2 个月。观察到 2.6%的患者发生心力衰竭,尽管没有与心脏相关的死亡。在 TBP 亚分析中,继续接受 TBP 曲妥珠单抗治疗的患者从治疗开始到疾病进展的中位 OS 时间(>27.8 个月和 21.3 个月)长于停止治疗的患者(16.8 个月和 4.6 个月)。然而,这两组并非完全可比,因为继续接受 TBP 曲妥珠单抗治疗的患者在治疗开始时的预后更好。继续接受 TBP 曲妥珠单抗治疗的患者的中位 TTP (10.2 个月)长于停止治疗的患者(7.1 个月)。
Hermine 研究结果证实,MBC 患者一线曲妥珠单抗治疗的关键试验适用于临床实践。亚分析表明,TBP 曲妥珠单抗为接受一线曲妥珠单抗治疗的 MBC 患者提供了生存获益。