Suppr超能文献

中大型肝细胞癌患者的中期结果:一项随机对照试验,旨在确定射频消融联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞的疗效。

Midterm outcomes in patients with intermediate-sized hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial for determining the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.

机构信息

Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer. 2010 Dec 1;116(23):5452-60. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25314. Epub 2010 Jul 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To improve the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of intermediate-sized hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), the authors compared RFA combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) to RFA alone.

METHODS

The authors randomly assigned 37 patients with solitary HCCs (diameter, 3.1-5.0 cm in the greatest dimension) to 2 groups: the TACE-RFA group, in which the patients received TACE followed by RFA on the same day, and the RFA group, in which the patients received only RFA.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved after 1.4±0.5 RFA sessions in the RFA group and after 1.1±0.2 RFA sessions in the TACE-RFA group (P<.01). The mean diameters of the longer and shorter axes of the RFA-induced ablated areas were 50±8.0 mm and 41±7.1 mm, respectively, in the RFA group and 58±13.2 mm and 50±11.3 mm, respectively, in the TACE-RFA group; the mean diameters of the shorter axes were significantly different (P=.012). The rates of local tumor progression at the end of the third year in the RFA and TACE-RFA groups were 39% and 6%, respectively (P=.012). The 3-year survival rates of the patients in the RFA and TACE-RFA groups were 80% and 93%, respectively (P=.369).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with intermediate-sized HCCs, RFA combined with TACE is more effective than RFA alone for extending the ablated area in fewer treatment sessions and for decreasing the local tumor progression rate.

摘要

背景

为提高射频消融(RFA)治疗中等大小肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效,作者比较了 RFA 联合经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与单纯 RFA。

方法

作者将 37 例单发 HCC(最大直径 3.1-5.0cm)患者随机分为两组:TACE-RFA 组患者先接受 TACE,同日再接受 RFA;RFA 组患者仅接受 RFA。

结果

RFA 组 1.4±0.5 次 RFA 后获得技术成功,TACE-RFA 组 1.1±0.2 次 RFA 后获得技术成功(P<.01)。RFA 组 RFA 诱导的消融区长径和短径的平均值分别为 50±8.0mm 和 41±7.1mm,TACE-RFA 组分别为 58±13.2mm 和 50±11.3mm;短径平均值差异有统计学意义(P=.012)。RFA 和 TACE-RFA 组患者在第 3 年末的局部肿瘤进展率分别为 39%和 6%(P=.012)。RFA 和 TACE-RFA 组患者的 3 年生存率分别为 80%和 93%(P=.369)。

结论

对于中等大小 HCC 患者,与单纯 RFA 相比,RFA 联合 TACE 可在较少的治疗次数中扩大消融区,并降低局部肿瘤进展率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验