Department of Advanced Treatment for Spine and Spinal Cord Disorders, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Aug;13(2):246-52. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09497.
The aim in this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the ball tip technique in placing thoracic pedicle screws (TPSs), as compared with the conventional freehand technique, in both a cadaveric study and a clinical study of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Although posterior spinal surgery using TPSs has been widely applied, these screws are associated with the potential risk of vascular, pulmonary, or neurological complications. To further enhance the accuracy and safety of TPS placement, the authors developed the ball tip technique.
After creating an appropriate starting point for probe insertion, a specially designed ball tip probe consisting of a ball-shaped tip with a flexible metal shaft is used to make a guide hole into the pedicle. Holding the probe with the fingertips while using an appropriate amount of pressure or by tapping it gently and continuously with a hammer, one can safely insert the ball tip probe into the cancellous channel in the pedicle. In a cadaveric study, 5 spine fellows with similar levels of experience in placing TPSs applied the ball tip or the conventional technique to place screws in 5 cadavers with no spinal deformities. The incidence of misplaced screws was evaluated by dissecting the spines. In a clinical study, 40 patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis underwent posterior surgery with TPS placement via the ball tip or conventional technique (20 patients in each treatment group). The accuracy of the TPS placements was evaluated on postoperative axial CT scanning.
In the cadaveric study, 100 TPSs were evaluated, and the incidence of misplaced screws was 14% in the ball tip group and 34% in the conventional group (p = 0.0192). In the clinical study, 574 TPSs were evaluated. One hundred seventy-one intrapedicular screws (67%) were recognized in the conventional group and 288 (90%) in the ball tip group (p < 0.01). In the conventional and ball tip groups, the respective numbers of TPSs with a pedicle breach of < or = 2 mm were 20 (8%) and 15 (5%), those with a pedicle breach of > 2 mm were 32 (13%) and 9 (3%; p < 0.01), and those located in the costovertebral joints were 32 (13%) and 7 (2%).
In both cadaveric and clinical studies the ball tip technique enhanced the accuracy of TPS placement as compared with the conventional freehand technique. Thus, the ball tip technique is useful for the accurate and safe placement of TPSs in deformed spines.
本研究旨在评估球头尖端技术在经皮胸椎置钉(TPS)中的疗效,与传统徒手技术相比,分别在尸体研究和青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的临床研究中进行。虽然使用 TPS 的后路脊柱手术已广泛应用,但这些螺钉存在血管、肺部或神经并发症的潜在风险。为了进一步提高 TPS 放置的准确性和安全性,作者开发了球头尖端技术。
在为探针插入创建合适的起点后,使用由球形尖端和柔性金属轴组成的特制球头尖端探针在椎弓根中制作导孔。术者用指尖握住探针,并施加适当的压力或用锤子轻轻连续敲击,可将球头尖端探针安全地插入椎弓根的松质骨通道。在尸体研究中,5 名具有相似 TPS 置入经验的脊柱外科医生在 5 具无脊柱畸形的尸体上应用球头尖端或传统技术置入螺钉。通过解剖脊柱评估螺钉错位的发生率。在临床研究中,40 例青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者接受后路手术,通过球头尖端或传统技术(每组 20 例)置入 TPS。术后轴向 CT 扫描评估 TPS 放置的准确性。
在尸体研究中,共评估了 100 个 TPS,球头尖端组的螺钉错位发生率为 14%,传统组为 34%(p = 0.0192)。在临床研究中,共评估了 574 个 TPS。传统组有 171 个椎弓根内螺钉(67%),球头尖端组有 288 个(90%)(p < 0.01)。在传统组和球头尖端组中,椎弓根内螺钉<或=2mm 骨皮质破坏的分别有 20 个(8%)和 15 个(5%),椎弓根内螺钉>2mm 骨皮质破坏的分别有 32 个(13%)和 9 个(3%;p < 0.01),位于肋椎关节的分别有 32 个(13%)和 7 个(2%)。
在尸体和临床研究中,与传统徒手技术相比,球头尖端技术提高了 TPS 放置的准确性。因此,球头尖端技术对于在畸形脊柱中准确、安全地放置 TPS 是有用的。