Laboratory of Molecular Imaging and Nanomedicine, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 31 Center Dr, Suite 1C14, Bethesda, MD, 20892-2281, USA.
Amino Acids. 2011 Feb;40(2):669-75. doi: 10.1007/s00726-010-0696-y. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
Two bombsin peptides, GRPR agonist [Aca-QWAVGHLM-NH(2)] and antagonist [fQWAVGHL-NHEthyl] were evaluated. We employed the highly sensitive Waters Q-Tof Premier MS coupled with a UPLC system to identify the metabolites produced by rat hepatocytes or PC-3 human prostate cancer cells; and we utilized the AB/MDS 4000 Q-Trap LC/MS/MS system with highly sensitive quantitative and qualitative performance, to quantitatively analyze the internalization of GRPR agonist and antagonist in PC-3 cells. The major metabolites of both GRPR agonist and antagonist were the result of peptide bond hydrolysis between W and A which was demonstrated by observation of the N-terminal fragment m/z 446 (Aca-QW-OH) for agonist and m/z 480 (fQW-OH) for antagonist. Both peptides were also hydrolyzed between A and V which formed peaks m/z 517 [Aca-QWA-OH] and m/z 555 (VGHLM-NH2) for the agonist and m/z 551 [fQWA-OH] and m/z 452 (VGHL-NHEthyl) for the antagonist. The peptide agonist also formed a unique metabolite that resulted from hydrolysis of the C-terminal amide. The antagonist showed significantly slower metabolism as compared to the agonist in both rat hepatocytes and PC-3 cells. The antagonist also showed significantly lower PC-3 cell internalization rate than that of the agonist. In conclusion, the metabolism profiles of both GRPR agonist and antagonist peptides were identified by LC/MS. The antagonist peptide was more stable than the agonist peptide in rat hepatocyte incubation. One major factor could be the hydrolysis-resistant C-terminal L-NHEthyl group compared with the unsubstituted amide of the agonist. Another factor could be different amino acid sequences of the agonist and antagonist that may also influence the enzymatic hydrolysis. The antagonist ligand is potentially more useful for receptor-targeted imaging due primarily to its higher metabolic stability.
两种肽类药物,GRPR 激动剂 [Aca-QWAVGHLM-NH(2)] 和拮抗剂 [fQWAVGHL-NHEthyl] 进行了评估。我们采用高度灵敏的 Waters Q-Tof Premier MS 与 UPLC 系统相结合,鉴定大鼠肝细胞或 PC-3 人前列腺癌细胞产生的代谢物;我们利用 AB/MDS 4000 Q-Trap LC/MS/MS 系统,具有高度灵敏的定量和定性性能,定量分析 GRPR 激动剂和拮抗剂在 PC-3 细胞中的内化。GRPR 激动剂和拮抗剂的主要代谢物都是由于 W 和 A 之间肽键水解的结果,这是通过观察激动剂的 N 端片段 m/z 446 (Aca-QW-OH) 和拮抗剂的 m/z 480 (fQW-OH) 得到证实的。这两种肽也在 A 和 V 之间水解,形成峰 m/z 517 [Aca-QWA-OH] 和 m/z 555 (VGHLM-NH2) 用于激动剂和 m/z 551 [fQWA-OH] 和 m/z 452 (VGHL-NHEthyl) 用于拮抗剂。该肽激动剂还形成了一种独特的代谢物,来源于 C 末端酰胺的水解。与激动剂相比,拮抗剂在大鼠肝细胞和 PC-3 细胞中的代谢速度明显较慢。拮抗剂在 PC-3 细胞内的摄取率也明显低于激动剂。总之,通过 LC/MS 鉴定了两种 GRPR 激动剂和拮抗剂肽的代谢谱。在大鼠肝细胞孵育中,拮抗剂肽比激动剂肽更稳定。一个主要因素可能是与激动剂的未取代酰胺相比,C 末端 L-NHEthyl 基团的水解抗性。另一个因素可能是激动剂和拮抗剂的不同氨基酸序列也可能影响酶解。由于其较高的代谢稳定性,拮抗剂配体对于受体靶向成像可能更有用。