• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生保健支出增长与死亡率降低之间几乎没有关联的证据。

Little evidence of correlation between growth in health care spending and reduced mortality.

机构信息

Tufts University School of Medicine, in Boston, Massachusetts, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1523-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0287.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0287
PMID:20679657
Abstract

As rapid U.S. health care spending growth continues, the question of whether additional dollars purchase better health or unnecessary care remains in sharp focus for policy makers, large employers, and other stakeholders. To investigate this question, we measured changes in mortality and cost for seven common diagnoses at 122 U.S. hospitals from 2000 to 2004. After adjusting for inflation, we found little correlation between reduced mortality for certain conditions and increased spending on patients with those conditions. The message to be underscored once again for policy makers is that health care dollars provide inconsistent value, and future spending increases should be targeted to care that improves outcomes.

摘要

随着美国医疗保健支出的快速增长,政策制定者、大雇主和其他利益相关者仍然高度关注这些额外的资金是否能带来更好的健康或不必要的医疗服务。为了研究这个问题,我们对 2000 年至 2004 年间美国 122 家医院的 7 种常见诊断的死亡率和成本变化进行了测量。经通胀调整后,我们发现某些疾病的死亡率降低与这些疾病患者的支出增加之间几乎没有相关性。对于政策制定者来说,这一信息需要再次强调,即医疗保健支出的价值并不一致,未来的支出增长应该针对改善结果的医疗服务。

相似文献

1
Little evidence of correlation between growth in health care spending and reduced mortality.卫生保健支出增长与死亡率降低之间几乎没有关联的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug;29(8):1523-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0287.
2
The value of medical spending in the United States, 1960-2000.1960年至2000年美国医疗支出的价值。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 31;355(9):920-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa054744.
3
Containing U.S. health care costs: what bullet to bite?控制美国医疗保健成本:该咬哪颗子弹?
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:1-12.
4
Costs of health care administration in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大的医疗保健管理成本。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 21;349(8):768-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022033.
5
National health spending in 2005: the slowdown continues.2005年的国家医疗支出:增速放缓仍在持续。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jan-Feb;26(1):142-53. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.1.142.
6
Explaining high health care spending in the United States: an international comparison of supply, utilization, prices, and quality.解释美国高昂的医疗保健支出:供给、利用、价格和质量的国际比较
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 May;10:1-14.
7
Explaining high health care spending in the United States: an international comparison of supply, utilization, prices, and quality.解释美国高昂的医疗保健支出:供给、利用、价格和质量的国际比较
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 May;10:1-14.
8
Trends in mental health cost growth: an expanded role for management?心理健康成本增长趋势:管理的作用是否应扩大?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 May-Jun;28(3):649-59. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.3.649.
9
Medical care costs: trends and outlook.医疗保健成本:趋势与展望。
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1999 Oct-Dec;80(4):28-33.
10
What's Been The Bang For The Buck? Cost-Effectiveness Of Health Care Spending Across Selected Conditions In The US.美国部分疾病的医保支出的性价比如何?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jan;38(1):68-75. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05158.

引用本文的文献

1
Saving Money or Just Saving Lives? Improving the Productivity of US Health Care Spending.省钱还是拯救生命?提高美国医疗保健支出的生产率。
Annu Rev Econom. 2012 Sep;4:33-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080511-110942. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
2
Study of influential factors of provincial health expenditure -analysis of panel data after the 2009 healthcare reform in China.省级卫生支出影响因素研究——2009 年中国医改后面板数据的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jul 1;20(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05474-1.
3
Public health and the economy could be served by reallocating medical expenditures to social programs.
将医疗支出重新分配到社会项目中,可以为公共卫生和经济服务。
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Jan 22;3:185-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.01.004. eCollection 2017 Dec.
4
Association Between Medicare Expenditure Growth and Mortality Rates in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Comparison From 1999 Through 2014.1999 年至 2014 年期间,医疗保险支出增长与急性心肌梗死患者死亡率之间的关联:比较研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;3(2):114-122. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4771.
5
Lesion-Specific Factors Contributing to Inhospital Costs in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.影响成人先天性心脏病患者住院费用的病变特异性因素
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jun 1;117(11):1821-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Mar 19.
6
Regional disparities in hospitalization charges for patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor resection in New York State: correlation with outcomes.纽约州肿瘤切除开颅手术患者住院费用的地区差异:与治疗结果的相关性
J Neurooncol. 2016 Jun;128(2):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2122-0. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
Rehospitalization Is a Major Determinant of Inpatient Care Costs in Adult Congenital Heart Disease.再入院是成人先天性心脏病住院护理费用的主要决定因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1254-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.043.
8
Measuring Returns to Hospital Care: Evidence from Ambulance Referral Patterns.衡量医院护理的回报:来自救护车转诊模式的证据。
J Polit Econ. 2015 Feb 1;123(1):170-214. doi: 10.1086/677756.
9
The association of unfavorable outcomes with the intensity of neurosurgical care in the United States.在美国,不良结局与神经外科护理强度之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 19;9(3):e92057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092057. eCollection 2014.
10
Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey.2001 年至 2009 年美国急性呼吸衰竭的流行病学和结局:一项全国性调查。
J Hosp Med. 2013 Feb;8(2):76-82. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2004. Epub 2013 Jan 18.